Ventisca
Team Owner
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2018
- Messages
- 2,569
- Points
- 293
I freaking love Kyle Busch!
That's a good question, but since they don't report the chassis numbers on Jayski anymore it's anybodies guess.Do the top teams ever use new cars during this part of the season or are they saving them for the final 10 races?
Gonna be a pretty ****** race based on comments from alot of cup drivers today...
He was good here pre-"package"ahh yes, they stickied up the Kyle Larson line. It's not like he was already really good here or anything.
he ran 28th and 17th last year. 14th in the first one this year. Qualified 19 for this race. I don't think I would put a bundle on him winningHe was good here pre-"package"
Gonna be a pretty ****** race based on comments from alot of cup drivers today...
But the quality green flag passes...Gonna be a pretty ****** race based on comments from alot of cup drivers today...
X cars are at Mid-Ohio, remember?it will be interesting to see if the trucks get up there and if the Xfinities use it.
And Kyle's story
They were “hooked up” and appear to be operating correctly.Would someone explain the advantage of not having the alternator hooked up? Would not having to turn the belt result in enough less demand on the engine to be competitively measurable?
Thanks.
It’s pretty sad when the engine is so anemic that eliminating alternator draw could yield a noticeable performance advantage.They were “hooked up” and appear to be operating correctly.
Removing or modifying the coils eliminates the parasitic horsepower loss caused by the friction normally created by these components. The battery is not receiving electrons but you’re only out there for a few minutes.
It’s not a new idea.It’s pretty sad when the engine is so anemic that eliminating alternator draw could yield a noticeable performance advantage.
I imagine not.It’s not a new idea.
So obviously nothing that could have been left undone by mistake. Thanks.They were “hooked up” and appear to be operating correctly.
Removing or modifying the coils eliminates the parasitic horsepower loss caused by the friction normally created by these components. The battery is not receiving electrons but you’re only out there for a few minutes.
it looked like an alternator.So obviously nothing that could have been left undone by mistake. Thanks.
Would someone explain the advantage of not having the alternator hooked up? Would not having to turn the belt result in enough less demand on the engine to be competitively measurable?
Thanks.
Supposedly a water pump driven cooling fan is worth 7 hp. So, not out of the question that alternator pull is parasitic on a 500hp mill.As others have said....eliminating the function of the alternator, the drag created from it charging reducing HP due to parasitic loss, “gives” that back.
It’s why underdrive pulley sets were all the rage years ago for street cars....spin the alt and w/p slower and make MOAR horsepower! Many a buttdyno felt the additional 1.25 ponies.
It’s science, it works, but with an engine baselining at 550 hp I find it hard to believe an extra 1 or 2 would in any way be quantifiable on the track. Disconnecting the oil pump? That would open up more for sure, but I doubt any team would give that one a go...
It’s about hundredths of a second.As others have said....eliminating the function of the alternator, the drag created from it charging reducing HP due to parasitic loss, “gives” that back.
It’s why underdrive pulley sets were all the rage years ago for street cars....spin the alt and w/p slower and make MOAR horsepower! Many a buttdyno felt the additional 1.25 ponies.
It’s science, it works, but with an engine baselining at 550 hp I find it hard to believe an extra 1 or 2 would in any way be quantifiable on the track. Disconnecting the oil pump? That would open up more for sure, but I doubt any team would give that one a go...
Seemed like Kyle rehearsed his responses --