Aging ranks of NASCAR team owners raise questions of who will carry torch

FLRacingFan

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
40,098
Points
1,033
Location
Florida
Interesting stuff in here that connects various aspects of the sport. The charter system, dependency upon sponsorship dollars, possible spending caps...

Aging team ownership in NASCAR has primed the sport for consolidation and change in the coming years that could involve mergers, sales or family heirs assuming new roles.

Of the 12 people who own or co-own the eight biggest teams in the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, 11 are at least 50, eight are at least 60, six are at least 70 and two are at least 80. While the owners’ ages may not differ far from those of other sports, their impact on the sport is arguably far greater. Those eight teams represent 22 cars, or more than half the maximum grid. While many of them say they have no current plans to retire, there’s still plenty of planning and jockeying going on that will determine the next chapter for their teams.

“It’s ripe for consolidation,” said David Morton, vice president of strategy and business development for motorsports at Fifth Third Bank, which sponsors and banks with several entities in the sport. “On the team side, there’s certainly a number of team owners who are reaching the age where they may be interested in merging with another team or outright selling to another team, so some of it is just based on the timing in the market.”

NASCAR introduced its charter system to the Monster Energy Series last year in a bid to grow enterprise value for current owners and entice fresh investment. So far, the biggest ownership moves have come from a few less competitive teams shutting down. And while JTG Daugherty added a car last season, a sign of strength from one of the sport’s mid-pack teams, others reduced cars. There also is renewed talk of some less competitive teams shutting down and of some bigger teams considering car reductions for next year.

Still, Brent Dewar, NASCAR’s president and an architect of the charter system, said the sanctioning body is content with where the sport is from a team owner perspective.

“We’re always looking, as the existing team owners are, for new owners to come into the sport,” Dewar said. “(But) we love the owners we have; that’s why we entered into the charter process. We recognize that time is a (factor); some teams will go on to sons, daughters and granddaughters like we’ve seen, and some won’t — some will transact and move to a different place, but we’ve provided a mechanism to do that and that’s the key.”

Discussion in the garage frequently focuses on who will be the next generation of owners in a sport that has experienced little new blood. The concern is twofold: How much longer the current leaders of NASCAR teams will remain in the sport, and the lack of new investors interested in getting involved. The latter is of real concern, as some believe the challenging business model and high expense of team ownership is discouraging wealthy individuals from investing into NASCAR compared to other sports.

Bob Caporale, chairman of Game Plan, which advises on buying and selling sports teams but has only been involved in one deal in NASCAR, said he rarely hears from investors about looking at getting into NASCAR. He thinks the sport’s unique structure might be the biggest barrier to entry. Unlike in stick-and-ball sports, teams are independent contractors; moreover, teams in motorsports rely on corporate sponsorship, which is becoming increasingly erratic, for the majority of their revenue, as opposed to guaranteed league revenue.

“The structure is probably the most difficult [part], and then the other thing is, has anybody been able to identify new revenue sources?” Caporale said. “The teams are very dependent on sponsor revenue, so each team has the selling expense, and in a way they’re competing with one another for the sponsors, whereas in other leagues, the league can get sponsors who are league sponsors and the money trickles down to every team.”

The last major owner to come into one of those eight teams was about seven years ago, when Andrew Murstein, now 53, became one of the youngest owners in the sport by purchasing Richard Petty Motorsports. He bought the team in late 2010 for $12 million, a tenth of the $120 million that George Gillett reportedly spent in 2007 before he defaulted on a $90 million loan against the team.

Murstein said he has told NASCAR Chairman and CEO Brian France that he believes NASCAR needs a cap on expenses to rein in the sport’s research and development investments.

“I had dinner with Brian France and an NFL owner recently and I told Brian some of the things that make the NFL so successful is a spending cap and parity,” Murstein, who also owns the New York Lizards of Major League Lacrosse, wrote in an email. “I believe NASCAR needs both to take this great sport to another level. He seemed receptive.”

Other owners to get into NASCAR from other sports include Joe Gibbs, the former NFL head coach, and Fenway Sports Group, which owns the Boston Red Sox and EPL club Liverpool FC. Executives frequently dispute the accuracy of the numbers, but Forbes called Hendrick Motorsports the most valuable NASCAR team in 2016, with a value of $350 million on a reported $185 million in revenue. Joe Gibbs Racing was next at a value of $225 million on a reported $135 million in revenue, while Stewart-Haas Racing was third with a $180 million valuation on a reported $112 million in revenue. NASCAR teams typically require corporate sponsorship to make up about three quarters of their annual budget.

In a sport that’s often secretive, the issue of ownership succession is a sensitive one. In a survey conducted by SportsBusiness Journal with the majority owners of the eight previously mentioned organizations, only half responded to questions about their future in the sport. Out of those four, none said they had plans to retire.

Rick Hendrick, majority owner of HMS, said through a representative that he has a succession plan that he reviews annually. Among the people he expects to be involved include team president Marshall Carlson, his son-in-law, and Jeff Gordon, the broadcaster and former HMS driver who is an equity partner.

Dave Alpern, president of Joe Gibbs Racing, said that Gibbs has no plans to retire but that the team has a succession plan that involves keeping the team “in the Gibbs family, hopefully for generations.” Gibbs has eight grandchildren, Alpern noted, and the team has “every expectation that, if they choose, they will have this to be a part of.”

“We think about this a lot,” Alpern said. “We have 600 families that depend on us to make good decisions, so we wouldn’t be good stewards if we just woke up one day and said, ‘What would we do if Joe wasn’t here?’ We actually think about this all the time, (but) Joe plans to go nowhere — he will never retire; this is his life.”

RPM’s Murstein said he plans to be in the sport for multiple decades, while he said RPM co-owner and NASCAR Hall of Famer Richard Petty, 80, “focuses a little more on the short term.”

Richard Childress, majority owner of his eponymous team, also has no plans to retire, but does have a plan in place for retirement that is reviewed regularly. Those expected to be involved in the future of the team include Mike Dillon, who is senior vice president of business operations and is Childress’ son-in-law as well.

Another team whose future will be watched closely is Wood Brothers Racing, the Team Penske-aligned outfit that is the longest-running team in the sport, dating back to the 1950s. Jon Wood, director of business development for WBR and a current stakeholder, said the family has a structure set up to keep the team in the family for years to come.

Jack Roush, co-owner of Roush Fenway Racing, didn’t comment for this article, but he told the Arizona Republic this year that he was “probably down to a three-year window.”

Dewar said NASCAR helps teams pitch prospective owners and investors of the sport. He said that can range from a cold call from the investment community to supporting a team owner who is talking to a prospect about coming into the sport. But he would not offer any details of recent efforts at recruiting.

Most recently, RPM and Roush Fenway explored a merger last year because both teams were seeking greater stability, according to sources familiar with the matter. The deal was eventually called off, and whether either team is still evaluating mergers or sales could not be confirmed.

In any event, most executives agree that change is coming.

“I think there will be more activity [in the coming years] because people from an international perspective are more interested in NASCAR, owners set up a situation where there is now more enterprise value when someone is buying these teams, and there is an aging demographic,” said Andrew Kline, founder and managing director of Park Lane, a sports investment bank that works with several stakeholders in the NASCAR space. “People are worried about estate planning.”

eF6pi5l.png


http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/...s-and-Governing-Bodies/NASCAR-ownernship.aspx
 
In not sure why this is viewed as a big deal there are many multigenerational businesses out there

It's an issue if the main partner bows out and the other one is left holding the bag.

Say Chip and Felix want to fold, I dont think Kaufmann would want to eat up the whole cost that would be running an entire operation by himself so it is more likely that he would just go too.

These are people that aren't looking to run a team full time so they decide to partner up.
 
Ok I am pretty sure those owners have plans in place for who takes over, that would be silly to think otherwise.
 
It's an issue if the main partner bows out and the other one is left holding the bag.

Say Chip and Felix want to fold, I dont think Kaufmann would want to eat up the whole cost that would be running an entire operation by himself so it is more likely that he would just go too.

These are people that aren't looking to run a team full time so they decide to partner up.
I doubt that any of these guys are eating costs personally.
 
Ok I am pretty sure those owners have plans in place for who takes over, that would be silly to think otherwise.
Roger Penske has a succession plan in place?

What a novel idea.
 
Not to worry as the owners have these very valuable things called charters they will cash in on big time if they decide to sell.
 
Thanks for posting that, FL. It is a good review of a topic we discussed at length back when the charter system was coming out, and includes a few new nuggets of information. I'm not surprised to read that this is a frequent topic of discussion in the Nascar industry, because it is the single greatest threat to Nascar's long term future IMO.

The greatest asset that Big Bill France and Bill Jr. had in building up the sport was a raft of sportsmen who loved racing and were eager to compete as race team owners, showing up every week to compete and put on the show. A certain business model emerged that reflected that, and as the financial climate has evolved, those owners have become an endangered species. And there is not a history of successful generational transitions as the founding owners age and leave the sport. There may be plans for multi-generational continuity, but until it happens successfully, success is not proven. It's never happened before, with the sole exception of Petty Enterprises passing from Lee's control to Richard's some decades ago.

I believe the economics of owning a Nascar team are basically non-viable from a financial perspective, considering the low returns and high risk. The charter system is a necessary step. Next comes controlling total expenses and re-thinking revenue distribution, IMO. How valuable is Nascar, and how valuable are ISC and SMI, without top quality teams showing up to race each week? We may find out in the coming years.
 
Thanks for posting that, FL. It is a good review of a topic we discussed at length back when the charter system was coming out, and includes a few new nuggets of information. I'm not surprised to read that this is a frequent topic of discussion in the Nascar industry, because it is the single greatest threat to Nascar's long term future IMO.

The greatest asset that Big Bill France and Bill Jr. had in building up the sport was a raft of sportsmen who loved racing and were eager to compete as race team owners, showing up every week to compete and put on the show. A certain business model emerged that reflected that, and as the financial climate has evolved, those owners have become an endangered species. And there is not a history of successful generational transitions as the founding owners age and leave the sport. There may be plans for multi-generational continuity, but until it happens successfully, success is not proven. It's never happened before, with the sole exception of Petty Enterprises passing from Lee's control to Richard's some decades ago.

I believe the economics of owning a Nascar team are basically non-viable from a financial perspective, considering the low returns and high risk. The charter system is a necessary step. Next comes controlling total expenses and re-thinking revenue distribution, IMO. How valuable is Nascar, and how valuable are ISC and SMI, without top quality teams showing up to race each week? We may find out in the coming years.

I agree with your points especially in the last paragraph. You have to be wealthy prior to getting into Nascar as you won't become wealthy due to Nascar. The Charter system is a good idea but when you flood the market with them and there are more charters then what is needed they are not worth much. I do think that Nascar will have to go to some form of revenue sharing system and a hard spending cap. The problem is what will the next broadcast deal look like? If current trends hold Nascar is on pace to start having races with less than 2 million viewers beginning in 2018 and if the demographics don't improve what will the package of races be worth in a few years?
 
plenty of guessing and be gollying in this thread. There have been over 250 car owners in Nascar over the years, 52 in Indycar. When their time is finished more will take their place.
 
Some of the best racing and the closest finish in Indycar history was during the great depression and it stood for 45 year until the Rick Mears, Johncock finish in 82. They went with what they called "the junkyard formula" to lower costs to competitors.
They cut the prize money in half and they had to limit the entries from 42 to 33 they had so many. 33 is still the number today.
IMO Nascar can at any time make sweeping changes if they need to just like Indianapolis had to when times were exceptionally tight the tightest in our history to attract more cars to the sport if they need to.
http://www.espn.com/racing/racing/i...umns/story?columnist=oreovicz_john&id=6492134
 
this IS a story. anyone have a list of new owners looking to buy a charter? which current drivers are interested in taking over owners positions?

my thought is the market for nascar team ownership is worse than the burst housing bubble.

on the bright side... maybe we are returning to the market that created this monster. fewer team efforts. open spots for newbies.

JMO
 
Most of the big time owners like Penske and Roush have the infrastructure to continue on after the name sake either retires or unfortunately passes. Gibbs has JD who is more than likely to take over once Joe is done. Hendrick has built an empire and plenty of relationships with drivers like Jr. and Gordon who could carry on after him.
 
All of the teams mentioned are multi-million dollar operations run by professional managers.

It's difficult to imagine that a viable succession plan isn't in place for the benefit of the heirs of each of the owners. Gordon and Earnhardt would make nice figureheads. See R. Petty.
 
Most of the big time owners like Penske and Roush have the infrastructure to continue on after the name sake either retires or unfortunately passes. Gibbs has JD who is more than likely to take over once Joe is done. Hendrick has built an empire and plenty of relationships with drivers like Jr. and Gordon who could carry on after him.
I doubt JD is going to be able to take over
 
I doubt JD is going to be able to take over

Why not? He already owns some of the cars and I'm sure they have a plan for once Joe is gone. JD seems to have a good relationship with Kyle who is also interested in ownership as welk if something like that is needed.
 
Why not? He already owns some of the cars and I'm sure they have a plan for once Joe is gone. JD seems to have a good relationship with Kyle who is also interested in ownership as welk if something like that is needed.
Because his health has reached such a point where he already has very limited involvement. He's suffering from brain issues, that's pretty serious stuff..
 
Hendrick has built an empire and plenty of relationships with drivers like Jr. and Gordon who could carry on after him.

Gordon yes, possibly along with Johnson.at his side.
Can't see Jr moving into management at HMS. More likely he'll keep his xfinity teams.
 
I'll pass that on to Richard Childress. And Teresa Earnhardt.
It won't do you much good. Teresa was only successful because she was married to Dale. Without him all she had was money. Richard also got his fame because he had Dale as his driver. I doubt he could have done it on his own. His organization was built before Harvick and he didn't have any other successful drivers.
 
By having a completely different business structure from what exists in Nascar. Different in every way.
Different in every way? Apparently not in the way they have built in succession plans. Or perhaps you and I have a different definition of the word every..
 
Back
Top Bottom