Sounds like the people who actually vote for HoF inductees will have to redefine "successful". Brett Bodine, Bobby Hillin Jr. and Phil Parsons all WON a race. Would they be considered "successful"? If not, why not? Is Danica considered successful because she is a she? Does that alone merit HoF credentials? I think not. Is she in the same league as Petty, Earnhardt, Allison, Yarbrough, Labonte, Elliot, Jarrett and Wallace and so on? If she's in, then Janet Guthrie has to be in. She was actually far more competitive. Danica is the beneficiary of a cultural shift where showing up at the park guarantees you a trophy. It's a silly notion that she should be in the HoF. If she's in, everybody should be in. Jimmy Means parlayed a journeyman career as an independent into e few different business interest. He has done fairly well for himself, after starting with very little. Should he in the HoF? HoF credentials should only be based on on track success, not on gender. Is that not equality?