Let's look at this objectively.
Driver X was in IndyCar. He had 117 starts with an average finish of 10.7 (in a field typically with 20-25 cars) and 1 win.
Then, Driver X went to Nationwide and in 60 races, had 0 wins and an average finish of 21.21 (in a field with 43 cars) and 0 wins.
Then, Driver X goes to Sprint Cup and in 26 races, has 0 wins and an average finish of 26.8.
Would you think Driver X is a good driver?
Driver X is, of course, Danica Patrick.
I don't have the borderline misogynistic hate that some people have for her, but she is a medicore race car driver who doesn't warrant the media, sponsor and fan attention she gets.
I thought Brad Keselowski said it best. They asked him at Daytona what he thought about women drivers in NASCAR. He said, "When Danica (Patrick) gets in the car, I don't think, 'Oh there's that girl.' I think, 'Oh, there's that 30th-place driver.'"
In my humble opinion, everybody who lines up to play white knight and defend Danica Patrick is just as stupid as everybody who hates her because she's a woman in a man's sport. Considering this forum has an aversion to drivers who come from wealthy families (aka dada's money), I can just imagine what all these message board white knights would think if Danica Patrick was born Dan Menard or Dan Childress and was getting a full ride and plenty of chances because of her last name instead of the fact she was a hot woman.