Reck
Team Owner
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2006
- Messages
- 31,243
- Points
- 1,013
The difference between Busch and Gordon is that Busch is a high performer.
Jeff Gordon: Top 10: 16
Top 5: 7
Wins: 0
Kyle Busch: Top 10: 20
Top 5: 16
Wins: 4
Jimmie Johnson: Top 10: 20
Top 5: 13
Wins: 5
Matt Kenseth: Top 10: 17
Top 5: 9
Wins: 5
Statistically speaking, Jimmie Johnson, Matt Kenseth and Kyle Busch have a better chance of still having a chance to win going into Homstead, whereas Gordon has less of a chance. Looking at Gordon's stats for the 2013 season, the man is either inconsistent or he consistently finishes just outside the top 10, it depends on how you look at the data.
I'm sorry, but I stand by my prediction. It'll come down to Johnson, Busch, and Kenseth.
No idea why you are throwing stats around for.
Jeff Gordon is 6, 15, (Worst, chase race finish thus far) 4, 3, 7, 14
This has been Gordon's best stretch of the year by far. The only inconsistency here is his crew chief.
Only driver screw up was at New Hampshire where he could have easily won the thing had he not overshot his pit.
Dover is another race where he had pegged before the caution.
I'm curious to see where you're getting those stats that say they have a better chance at winning going into homestead whereas Gordon has a less chance.
Of the chasers, Jimmie is the only one who has a better chance at winning at Martinsville.
Like I said, you're trying way to hard here.