SpeedPagan
The iRacing Guru
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 19,354
- Points
- 1,033
Now y'all could make the case that the only reason I'm making this thread is that the late race caution at the race on Saturday night cost my favorite driver an easy win. However, I'm more of the mind that a bad call on the last pit stop by Chad and the crappy restart was what cost Johnson that win.
However, that doesn't excuse the phantom debris caution that we saw last night. I have never been a fan of these kind of cautions, because it makes the race look manufactured and artificial. I have read several articles about how NASCAR swears up and down that when they throw a caution, it's for a good reason. However, last Saturday, I have not seen any debris on the track from what I was watching on my TV.
Honestly, I have to wonder if they'd thrown that caution if Earnhardt Jr. was leading the race, or if they would've let it play out and let Earnhardt Jr. get that guaranteed win. NASCAR claims they don't play "favorites" with the driver, but everyone and their grandmother knows that an Earnhardt Jr. win would rake in some mad cash for the organization.
These phantom debris cautions do not solve the problem of a drawn out, single file field. The problem is the car themselves, they're just so aero dependent that once the leader gets out into that clean air, he is gone. I like the Gen6 cars, I think they're an improvement, but it's clear that NASCAR still has a long way to go.
In the meantime, they either need to get rid of the phantom debris caution and let things play out, no matter how boring it may be to the viewers and people at the track or they need to start showing these debris.
I will admit, I am kinda upset that the caution ruined Knaus/Johnson strategy, I thought they beautifully executed the pit stop before the caution and lined themselves up for a sure win. However, this doesn't mean that my points about the caution are not valid, and I have always criticized these phantom debris cautions no matter who it benefited or who it hurt.
However, that doesn't excuse the phantom debris caution that we saw last night. I have never been a fan of these kind of cautions, because it makes the race look manufactured and artificial. I have read several articles about how NASCAR swears up and down that when they throw a caution, it's for a good reason. However, last Saturday, I have not seen any debris on the track from what I was watching on my TV.
Honestly, I have to wonder if they'd thrown that caution if Earnhardt Jr. was leading the race, or if they would've let it play out and let Earnhardt Jr. get that guaranteed win. NASCAR claims they don't play "favorites" with the driver, but everyone and their grandmother knows that an Earnhardt Jr. win would rake in some mad cash for the organization.
These phantom debris cautions do not solve the problem of a drawn out, single file field. The problem is the car themselves, they're just so aero dependent that once the leader gets out into that clean air, he is gone. I like the Gen6 cars, I think they're an improvement, but it's clear that NASCAR still has a long way to go.
In the meantime, they either need to get rid of the phantom debris caution and let things play out, no matter how boring it may be to the viewers and people at the track or they need to start showing these debris.
I will admit, I am kinda upset that the caution ruined Knaus/Johnson strategy, I thought they beautifully executed the pit stop before the caution and lined themselves up for a sure win. However, this doesn't mean that my points about the caution are not valid, and I have always criticized these phantom debris cautions no matter who it benefited or who it hurt.