J
Jas61
Guest
And here I was bummed about missing the race - Sounds like I got lucky, instead.
So last year's broadcast was longer but had less commercial time.
Attending every race is an option for probably 0.0001% of the US population.non stop ---no commercial opportunity is available every race .
buy a ticket...and attend. ...............
For those of you interested, Caws n Jaws has the stats up. Most interesting is the comparison to last year.
2016: Total race brdcst time 143 Total comm. brdcst time 47
2015: Total race brdcst time 168 Total comm. brdcst time 35
So last year's broadcast was longer but had less commercial time.
http://www.cawsnjaws.com/article/78...o-the-2016-coke-zero-400-powered-by-coca-cola
Wouldn't those commercials have already been bought and paid for though?Last year's race was in overnight hours. This year's was in prime time.
Huge difference there.
Can't do a 'Through the Field' in the four minutes they had between ads.Did anyone else notice their "Through The Field" consisted of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and then 24th place Ryan Newman? Then cut to commercial.
No talk/replays about Kurt spinning at the end? Where are all the driver interviews? They are too busy showing Brad's half assed burnouts for a good 10 minutes.
I knew NBC loved commercials, but this was ridiculous. And when they were actually showing racing, the commentary was mediocre at best.
That's what I thought too. Maybe Andy will expound.Wouldn't those commercials have already been bought and paid for though?
Can't do a 'Through the Field' in the four minutes they had between ads.
They were on the air for countless hours before the race went green.Wouldn't those commercials have already been bought and paid for though?
That includes caution periods as well, and most of the air time last night was during caution periods. If they only measured green flag coverage, I bet only 35% of the race would have been broadcast instead of 75%.For those of you interested, Caws n Jaws has the stats up. Most interesting is the comparison to last year.
2016: Total race brdcst time 143 Total comm. brdcst time 47
2015: Total race brdcst time 168 Total comm. brdcst time 35
So last year's broadcast was longer but had less commercial time.
http://www.cawsnjaws.com/article/78...o-the-2016-coke-zero-400-powered-by-coca-cola
To everybody that says "the ratings were 100% in my house" or "TV ratings don't matter to me", this is why they matter. When there aren't as many people watching, the value of each ad goes down, and more ads must be sold to compensate.
One of the worst broadcasts? I think you're being generous.
non stop ---no commercial opportunity is available every race .
buy a ticket...and attend. ...............
Have to echo the posters who thought the commercials were the worst ever. The actual NBC production might not be half bad, but it's hard to make that determination when they're on air for 3 minutes at a time.
Seriously, when they came back from commercials with 17 laps to go I thought, "Surely they'll go commercial free to the end from here. That's why they packed so many commercials in early."
3 laps later they went back to side by side.
I get the whole bit about declining TV ratings and all that, but it's becoming a vicious cycle -- there's absolutely no way they're going to be able to draw in any new fans with that kind of broadcast. If you weren't invested previously, who the hell would sit through that many KFC ads?
I thought the NBC broadcast was mediocre, but complaining about commercials is sort of like complaining about taxes. And as noted, last year's race was delayed into the late night, which may affect it, or maybe not. However, the NBC broadcast had less time devoted to commercials than Fox did at the 500 in February...For those of you interested, Caws n Jaws has the stats up. Most interesting is the comparison to last year.
2016: Total race brdcst time 143 Total comm. brdcst time 47
2015: Total race brdcst time 168 Total comm. brdcst time 35
So last year's broadcast was longer but had less commercial time.
http://www.cawsnjaws.com/article/78...o-the-2016-coke-zero-400-powered-by-coca-cola
I thought the NBC broadcast was mediocre, but complaining about commercials is sort of like complaining about taxes. And as noted, last year's race was delayed into the late night, which may affect it, or maybe not. However, the NBC broadcast had less time devoted to commercials than Fox did at the 500 in February...
NBC Coke 400: Race 143; ads 47; total 190 (race = 75.3%).
Fox Daytona 500: Race 155; ads 58; total 213 (race = 72.8%).
3 laps later they went back to side by side.
You could still see the race.
Seriously, now we're complaining about being able to actually see the race during commercials.
Yeah, when nearly 40% of the green flag action is interrupted by commercials in some form or another, that's pretty bad. This is what I was afraid of when Fox and NBC overpaid for the TV rights a few years ago.I certainly prefer side-by-side to not side-by-side, but it seems like NBC used it as an excuse to cram in way more commercials.
All this negativity makes me want to listen to Lawrence Welk while sipping arsenic laced
Moxie in a bathtub full of Hydrocloric acid.