S
Skoalbandit33
Guest
Which of the current multi-talented crop of NASCAR drivers have said that?
Busch Bros and recently retired Tony to name 3.
Which of the current multi-talented crop of NASCAR drivers have said that?
Those drivers who are less skilled at living on the very edge of the razor at 190 mph will generally be more comfortable at 90 mph.
I don't mind the mile and a half because I feel they produce the best style of racing for NASCAR. I won't deny I'd like to see some more variety in the tracks and even some new ones built as some tracks don't need two dates I believe. I know Gordon is working on one up in Canada similar to Richmond but things are going slow with it. I think a track like Bristol in NYC would be cool as well and they could use at least one more road course or maybe even a street circuit of sorts.
When I say style of racing I'm talking about how they showcase the cars. On those tracks these cars get tested at high speeds that are safer than superspeedways. They are the ideal tracks to race on in my opinion.
http://buildingspeed.org/blog/2012/04/13/cookie-cutter-tracks/I’d say there are actually only three ‘cookie cutter’ tracks: Texas and Charlotte are identical twins that get their hair cut differently and refuse to wear identical clothing. Atlanta is a fraternal twin to Texas and Charlotte. Lumping the D-Shaped Ovals in with these tracks, however, is unfair. The issues that many race fans have with racing at these tracks requires changing the car rather than changing the track.
Googled the hell out of that. Nothing so far.Busch Bros and recently retired Tony to name 3.
Googled the hell out of that. Nothing so far.
I will press on. May need lawyers, guns and money.
A good start on the subject, although silent on transitions between the straight and the corner banking, which are crucial.Dr. Deandra Lesley-Peleckie ...
http://buildingspeed.org/blog/2012/04/13/cookie-cutter-tracks/
A good read ... should be a piece of cake for everyone who complains about the short attention spans of younger people.
Maybe we should use The Brobs from now on.Using the term "cookie cutter" to describe any track of group of tracks is very lazy. They all have unique traits and nuances. Obviously the basic designs are quite similar because it's a design that works well in terms of grandstand viewing angles and event logistics.
Good catch and I agree, I should have not listed that one..Kentucky is extremely unique.
I would not say it's "cookie cutter" per say.
But The Brobdingnagians all produce the same style of racing to the naked eye.
^^^This used to be me^^^ But the clock is ticking.It is what it is, I will watch and enjoy all the tracks on the schedule, some more than others, but, I will enjoy all the events.
The cars have evolved to the point that the only way to fix this is to change the tracks. Lower banking will fix 90% of the issues.A cinder block flying through the air at 80 mph is affected by aerodynamics.
If Cup cars ever become less dependent upon highly refined aero, it will be because race speeds have been drastically reduced ... and a lesser degree of dependency will still exist. Physics.
This day foward Charlotte, Fort Worth, Kentucky, Atlanta, Kansas, Las Vegas, Kentucky, Texas, and Concord they all deserve respect, NO MORE COOKIE CUTTER.
Okay. So my addiction kicked in and I'm going to give the changes a chance. So I'm back on here.
Something about Kentucky & Texas:
NASCAR should remeasure the track length. If they measure the length 15 ft from the outside wall, and the track width has changed, I bet they are no longer 1.5 miles. This could change the number of laps needed for the races too.
So what size/shape track would suit you guys? Seems you don't actually like any of them.