Acs
Team Owner
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,649
- Points
- 343
This is one of the things I forgot to ask last season as I was getting up to speed with NASCAR. I know we all like to deride the 1.5 miler's as "cookie cutters", but the drivers and teams all are quick to say that isn't the case. Specifically though, if you asked any driver last year which of the 1.5's is the most challenging or most different, most would say Kansas. I'm struggling to figure out why that is. It's a tri-oval shape without any unique features, and progressively banked at 17-20 degrees which is middle of the pack.
And yet, go back and watch the xfinity series qualifying here from 2016 and the drivers are able to take this track flat-out. Granted, those cars had more downforce last year than the cup cars or this year, but still, that's incredible for that size of track. Charlotte and Texas and homestead are all banked more than Kansas yet as far as I'm aware cars were never able to be held flat-out around those tracks. So again, what is up with Kansas that makes this track so weird?
And yet, go back and watch the xfinity series qualifying here from 2016 and the drivers are able to take this track flat-out. Granted, those cars had more downforce last year than the cup cars or this year, but still, that's incredible for that size of track. Charlotte and Texas and homestead are all banked more than Kansas yet as far as I'm aware cars were never able to be held flat-out around those tracks. So again, what is up with Kansas that makes this track so weird?