This might be the worst post I've seen about this all week. The turtles had nothing to do with it.
I'm sick of the roval bashing as well I suppose you people all want to go back to when mile and a half tracks were like 24 out of 36 races and sucked. Charlotte only needs one oval date. You'll get all the 1.5 milers back and then complain the schedule is boring again. God forbid you people ever realize NASCAR does actual know what it's doing.
Meh I was due and happy to help with the entertainments, this was more of an accumulation of irrelevant grievances that I'm having with NASCAR that has me reaching a breaking point. It's a love hate relationship.
For the record, I never complained about the excitability of the Ovals back in 2009-2018 at it's peak of the 78 whomping the field, so I'm definitely not in the camp of those that wanted less Oval or those that thought the COT or Gen 6 was boring on intermediates. Is that why they're revisiting the DVP clock because they know what they're doing? Is that why cars are doing barrel rolls at Daytona?
But okay let's dive into it then and have a discussion on a discussion forum? Not the turtles, the stationary curbing then.
The point remains Bowman did not benefit from losing the ballast weight.
NASCAR has direct video evidence audio visual of what happened to the 48 on track that would cause the car to come back underweight. It did not benefit the 48 to lose the ballast from the car. It did not improve their performance, it was not intentional, it was an accidental occurrence from the jarring opposite directional forces of impact of going airborne and hard landing back down that caused the ballast weight to drop out on track, there can and should be allowances for accidents without intent in a live race with 36+ race cars on track, not everything will go perfectly as planned. If it is determined there must be a reprimanding to discourage further occurrences or suspicion of purpose, in regards to safety, then do so in a way that is meaningful outside of what can be controlled or not controlled.
Of course it’s not NASCAR’s responsibility for Bowman and the 48 team to make sure everything is fastened & secured to the maximum. But does NASCAR ever take responsibility for anything that they do? Or do they slough it off to the race teams at fault entirely. Because I am 100% confident this does not happen if they’re are running the Charlotte Oval and won’t happen this week in Vegas either. So what factor changed the equation? The Roval with curbing that can send this stiff as a board suspension zero give zero flex car airborne off all 4 tires. So maybe NASCAR should take an inkling of responsibility on that? and maybe not throw said car out of the playoffs for an accidental occurrence? Once again the 48 gained no benefit.
The curbing was actually reduced after the Xfinity race, from 4" to 2.5". If NASCAR wanted to intentionally knock off parts, they would have left it alone.
So far, no one had definitively said the car was underweight due to components falling off.
So much for that theory. Also, FEMA isn't taking people's property and there are no nanobots in COVID vaccine.
Noted, I guess I'm not saying NASCAR had intentions either whether they know it or not, it's an unintentional setup for where this could happen with this particular car imo.
Also noted, but I'm just going off of what I think more than likely happened while I'm left to twist in the wind by the powers at be, I don't find reason for the 48 to go intentional weight shaving beyond the limits to make much sense considering their points position going in, the risk doesn't seem worth the reward to me if they happened to get caught, but if it happens to come back they were toying with something else then this ain't my first rodeo lol.