Robin Miller is usually a cranky contrarian, and I didn't even notice what the crowd looked like on TV. Even if he's exaggerating and attendance was twice that, I don't get it. Ratings were poor. Not only did Supercross do significantly better directly opposite it on FS1, F1 qualifying got more viewers on ESPN2. My first choice on Saturday night was also Supercross, but I consider that to be a quirky niche thing. It is hard for me to reckon with it actually being more popular than an Indycar race.
I think the current IndyCar oval product is pretty good. I don't agree with Miller's characterization of Saturday's race as ho-hum, but that doesn't matter. People tune in or don't tune in based on perceptions from the past. They aren't waiting on pins and needles to hear through their social network whether tonight's race is good and then make a decision.
Nevertheless, Miller's thesis is that IndyCar on ovals is doomed to fail and makes no financial sense, and he's pointing toward these indicators to make the point. Is there a good argument against this? Because I like the mix they try to maintain, and would prefer that ovals be at least a third of the schedule.