StandOnIt
Farm Truck
figured this would probably rate it's own thread
I wish they would run it on the roval no matter the format.
Here we go again.
cool!
I'm sure its in that area, no place better to test something.If it's in the vein of "Hey, we realize we went too far, and we're going to experiment with reducing the splitter size and radiator pan width", I agree.
Here we go again.
I wish they would run it on the roval no matter the format.
I vote for running the first segment on the big track, the second segment on the Roval, then the final segment on the quarter-mile.
I vote for running the first segment on the big track, the second segment on the Roval, then the final segment on the quarter-mile.
Wait, don't we need stage 5 to run the 1/4 mile four wide to the finish?I wound add a stage 4. After stage 3 the pace leads them to the dirt track for stage 4.
Or, its always been said NASCAR is a team sport, so lets get the team involved and the final stage consist the teams packing up and heading back to the shop, first team that does one complete lap in the hauler wins the ASRI wound add a stage 4. After stage 3 the pace leads them to the dirt track for stage 4.
there are going to vent the air under the hood up and through the hood.
Just let it through a hole in the floor like Carl did.there are going to vent the air under the hood up and through the hood.
I'm sure its in that area, no place better to test something.
Well look at this way, you are gonna have a larger data base of info with everyone paticipationg instead of a few. You eliminate a possible travel date which is very expensive or even if you did a week day Charlotte test you still are spending time and resources that would already be incorporated during the All Star event. Real world testing beats sending 4 or 5 cars out.A test is a really good place to test something too.
Well look at this way, you are gonna have a larger data base of info with everyone paticipationg instead of a few. You eliminate a possible travel date which is very expensive or even if you did a week day Charlotte test you still are spending time and resources that would already be incorporated during the All Star event. Real world testing beats sending 4 or 5 cars out.
I think he has said both that he personally would not want it and that IF they could get rid of it, they would, but NASCAR's research prefers a splitter over a traditional valance. I think this is not unrelated to the X-3 car they've tested in the past, where they came across one combination where the splitter contributed ~10% of the car's total downforce versus ~25% on whatever year of Cup car they were comparing to. I think it was 2015 or 2016. So in dirty air there'd be less aero sensitivity, at least on the front end.Well, apparently Gen 7 still has a splitter at this point. I'm way less optimistic now. Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't O'Donnell say last year that the splitter would be gone?
I think he has said both that he personally would not want it and that IF they could get rid of it, they would, but NASCAR's research prefers a splitter over a traditional valance. I think this is not unrelated to the X-3 car they've tested in the past, where they came across one combination where the splitter contributed ~10% of the car's total downforce versus ~25% on whatever year of Cup car they were comparing to. I think it was 2015 or 2016. So in dirty air there'd be less aero sensitivity, at least on the front end.