23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

virtualbalboa said:
There's nothing that actually correlates those demands with the amount of money they receive from NASCAR. If NASCAR decreases the cut given to tracks and instead redirects that to teams, that has nothing to do with exclusivity.
Click to expand...
Who said anything about redirecting it to the teams?
 
wi_racefan said:
Who said anything about redirecting it to the teams?
Click to expand...
I mean, where else would the money go? What is the necessity for NASCAR to do what you're prescribing and reduce the track fees because they no longer can demand exclusivity?
 
virtualbalboa said:
This is solid gold. I hope you all are appreciating it.
Click to expand...
1762811519922.png

Live and learn. ;) I would suggest that you curtail your personal attacks and snidely remarks. It isn't a good look and it's a long off season.
Unlike the NFL or NBA, NASCAR doesn’t have a statutory exemption from antitrust law.
  • MLB does (since 1922).
  • The NFL, NBA, and NHL operate under partial exemptions (especially for TV deals, through the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961).
 
StandOnIt said:
View attachment 88672
Live and learn. ;) I would suggest that you curtail your personal attacks and snidely remarks. It isn't a good look and it's a long off season.
Unlike the NFL or NBA, NASCAR doesn’t have a statutory exemption from antitrust law.
  • MLB does (since 1922).
  • The NFL, NBA, and NHL operate under partial exemptions (especially for TV deals, through the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961).
Click to expand...
MLB does indeed have one. It is the only league that has such an exception.

Let me give you a hint: The 45th and 47th President of the US famously was involved in an antitrust lawsuit which he was party to the winning side of. Amusingly he wound up getting screwed by jury instructions.
 
virtualbalboa said:
I mean, where else would the money go? What is the necessity for NASCAR to do what you're prescribing and reduce the track fees because they no longer can demand exclusivity?
Click to expand...
Break the supposed monopoly they have over the tracks. If you're not allowed to demand exclusivity then why would you pay them near as much?
 
virtualbalboa said:
MLB does indeed have one. It is the only league that has such an exception.
Click to expand...
Again, "pure gold" you said, none of it was true. Other stick and Ball teams have limited anti trust exemptions.
Is it your turn now? again lets take it down a notch. We are supposed to be laughing right?
 
wi_racefan said:
Break the supposed monopoly they have over the tracks. If you're not allowed to demand exclusivity then why would you pay them near as much?
Click to expand...
I look at it this way also. We want safety standards, Who knows if Nascar gets part of the gate. But Nascar pays the tracks a percentage of the TV money. For that we want exclusive use for stock car racing. Deal or no deal. Concerts, car shows, on an on no problems there. Charlotte has a dirt track and a drag racing facility.
Again, this is my point. Bell said they can't use auto racing, only premiere stock car racing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom