23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

When reading the emails from the teams and from Nascar, Nascar had posted doomsday actions before entering the bunker. Most of it were actions to take to limit serious damage to the series and or make themselves a hard target for a takeover. Having the teams under contract and restricting their ability to race in ANY racing series but theirs was their way of nipping that in the bud.
Once again, it is in the realm of possibility that 23XI along with other investors simply could hold races, pay very well, and use Nascar's drivers and equipment to do so if Nascar didn't have non competitive contracts for teams and equipment.
 
StandOnIt said:
When reading the emails from the teams and from Nascar, Nascar had posted doomsday actions before entering the bunker. Most of it were actions to take to limit serious damage to the series and or make themselves a hard target for a takeover. Having the teams under contract and restricting their ability to race in ANY racing series but theirs was their way of nipping that in the bud.
Once again, it is in the realm of possibility that 23XI along with other investors simply could hold races, pay very well, and use Nascar's drivers and equipment to do so if Nascar didn't have non competitive contracts for teams and equipment.
Click to expand...
Well lets see if @wi_racefan is okay with something he said, being used here. Because yeah, I mean seems thin. ;)
wi_racefan said:
So this is all based on the potential of a possible threat? Boy that sounds thin.
Click to expand...
 
If a racetrack wants to hold a Nascar race, agreements have to be made. It has to pass requirements for safety, the purse payments have to be finalized, and in some cases agreements not to hold stock car like competing events for a period of time. That doesn't stop them from having concerts, car shows, other racing series etc.
 
StandOnIt said:
If a racetrack wants to hold a Nascar race, agreements have to be made. It has to pass requirements for safety, the purse payments have to be finalized, and in some cases agreements not to hold stock car like competing events for a period of time. That doesn't stop them from having concerts, car shows, other racing series etc.
Click to expand...
Congratulations, thats what makes it a monopoly.
 
StandOnIt said:
That's your opinion. Nobody is holding a gun to anybodies head.
Click to expand...
Its literally not an opinion. They control the market by making it so tracks that have NASCAR races have to have approval to hold any other stock car series. Yes those tracks can say no, but then they would lose their races. NASCAR is using that leverage to be able to prevent another series from having use of proper race tracks. Sure they are other tracks, but the sizes of them are small, and the safety ar some arent up to a proper standard for a legitimate racing series.
 
Speedbowl14 said:
This is probably gonna get deleted but if I had a dollar for everything you spoke through you ass this forum would be funded for the next millennium. Now that is an opinion fwiw
Click to expand...
If you knew your ass from a hole in the ground you would already know judge Bell ruled that Nascar was a monopoly. I'll let you figure out the rest of it Einstein. Hint. Read part 2 of the Sherman act.
 
images-11.jpeg
 
Do anyone know if the France and Hamlin families are on Wal Mart Christmas Gift Registry. This year could be tough on the families and they could go without due to implications caused by the
monopolies, cabuls, cartels, and other big words.

Maybe, I should go see if there is a GoFundMe account for them.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom