23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

StandOnIt said:
Maybe they can do like Nascar did. Get off their privileged asses, create a car, find and use tracks that others own to race on like Nascar did. Novel Idea I know in these days and times.
Click to expand...
They arent many Tracks ready for a big stock car series they dont own. They would have to basically race on small tracks that aren't up to good enough safety standards for a stock car series that could be on the level of NASCAR.

Maybe this will sway you, think if their monopoly was broken up, and someone could actually one day start a competive series, maybe then we could get a damn good points system that's not the joke that you constantly bitch that it is. Because if some other series comes along, does that, gains momentum, and NASCAR is still using some sort of playoff BS, maybe it makes NASCAR adapt.
 
Charlie Spencer said:
I'm guessing a lot of them, but no one has filed a lawsuit over it.
Click to expand...
In order to file a lawsuit, you have to first have suffered damages as a result of the actor you are suing since that is the purpose of bringing a civil suit. The average person doesn't qualify. Those who might qualify to sue such a company generally have reason not to do so and/or they don't meet the criteria.
 
Am I missing something here and does SMI have a contract to only hold nascar stock car races?

That's what 12 major tracks that anyone can run at right?
 
wi_racefan said:
Am I missing something here and does SMI have a contract to only hold nascar stock car races?

That's what 12 major tracks that anyone can run at right?
Click to expand...
No contract, but NASCAR could easily prevent it from just saying they would pull races from them.

11 tracks SMI owns. One of which isn't active(Kentucky) so basically 10 tracks. Charlotte is basically NASCAR's home, so i doubt they would work with a competitor. So we're down to 9. So if all tracks had 2 races we're looking at an 18 race maybe 20 if I'm wrong about Charlotte. But that's also assuming they would work with another stock car organization.

NASCAR being able to use any sort of power to do that, is what makes it a monopoly.
 
Blaze said:
No contract, but NASCAR could easily prevent it from just saying they would pull races from them.

11 tracks SMI owns. One of which isn't active(Kentucky) so basically 10 tracks. Charlotte is basically NASCAR's home, so i doubt they would work with a competitor. So we're down to 9. So if all tracks had 2 races we're looking at an 18 race maybe 20 if I'm wrong about Charlotte. But that's also assuming they would work with another stock car organization.

NASCAR being able to use any sort of power to do that, is what makes it a monopoly.
Click to expand...
So this is all based on the potential of a possible threat? Boy that sounds thin.
 
wi_racefan said:
So this is all based on the potential of a possible threat? Boy that sounds thin.
Click to expand...
Well if NASCAR would never do it, what would be so bad about ruling they couldn't? I mean if it wouldn't change anything on how they would handle the situation then its no big deal, correct? Or do we have to let them do what they want, and just hope they won't do it?
 
^ If 2 sausages were sitting in a frying pan discussing The Sherman act, it would sound something like this.

Cooked sausages, naturally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom