Burning down the house.
Depends on the judge. Bell has been trying to get them to work it out away from the court. Now it is getting complicated and with the time constraints, now time is of the essence.I really don't know much about our judicial system, is this common for a judge to be so outspoken in this regard?
This is a civil suit, not a criminal one. There's no jury to be influenced or contaminated, the judge himself will make all the decisions. His opinions are the only ones that have or will matter. Well, that matter until the eventual appeals reach the next judge(s).I really don't know much about our judicial system, is this common for a judge to be so outspoken in this regard?
Either way though civil or criminal some judges are outspoken, some aren't. Bell is in the hot seat with court dates that are already set.This is a civil suit, not a criminal one. There's no jury to be influenced or contaminated, the judge himself will make all the decisions. His opinions are the only ones that have or will matter. Well, that matter until the eventual appeals reach the next judge(s).
NASCAR still thinks they’re arguing a contract dispute.The amount of increase has nothing to do with whether or not NASCAR is a monopoly, Steve.
You don't think he has a point? And you're an American watching the billionaires gobble up everything in sight and rig the system? The 75% goes in their pockets.The amount of increase has nothing to do with whether or not NASCAR is a monopoly, Steve.
Righteous indignation also has nothing to do with the law. The judge's job isn't to decide 'right' or 'wrong', it's to decide what's conform within the laws passed by legislators and written in constitutions. Phelp's opinion (his word) and mine are irrelevant.You don't think he has a point? And you're an American watching the billionaires gobble up everything in sight and rig the system? The 75% goes in their pockets.