- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 7,279
- Points
- 773
Maybe but when asking for documents and being denied, that can't be considered a win?Your understanding of the discovery process appears to be minimal, at best.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Maybe but when asking for documents and being denied, that can't be considered a win?Your understanding of the discovery process appears to be minimal, at best.
It’s a loss for sure. A loss of time.Maybe but when asking for documents and being denied, that can't be considered a win?
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
The judge slapped it down decisively. It is going to be very hard for them to ramp it up and go for anti-trust over the contract dispute argument. At this point, they have proved nothing.Maybe but when asking for documents and being denied, that can't be considered a win?
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
To me it just shows that they're not going to come in and steam roll nascar like they've been telling everyone they will.It’s a loss for sure. A loss of time.
They’ll get the stuff they asked to have expedited when everything else is handed over.
I wasn’t aware they’d said anything like that but I certainly could have missed it.
Are you able to point to a particular post or posts where I’ve suggested anyone in this discussion is stupid?Naw nan, I'm stupid just like everybody else you are making them out to be.
They way their lawyer talked like this is so clearly illegal that anyone can see it and winning will be no issueI wasn’t aware they’d said anything like that but I certainly could have missed it.
You quoted me. Me .., the guy you bragged about having on ignore.That popcorn wasn't pointed at anyone. Just my opinion on whole thing. And last bag.
Your understanding of the discovery process appears to be minimal, at best.Are you able to point to a particular post or posts where I’ve suggested anyone in this discussion is stupid?
As I said … I could have missed those remarks and apparently I did.They way their lawyer talked like this is so clearly illegal that anyone can see it and winning will be no issue
This work? You posted it.I wasn’t aware they’d said anything like that but I certainly could have missed it.
Your understanding of the discovery process appears to be minimal, at best.
Surely you understand that the injunction application decision is much more consequential.
This work? You posted it.
“The France family and NASCAR are monopolistic bullies. And bullies will continue to impose their will to hurt others until their targets stand up and refuse to be victims. That moment has arrived.”
Ok. Back on ignore you go. What an a**hole. Consistently.You quoted me. Me .., the guy you bragged about having on ignore.
It never goes well for you when you come out of the storage shed. Some people never learn.
No picking, but tit for tat is what you will get.I believe the first comment is a non-personalized statement of fact. 3 other respected posters agreed with it and the person I was speaking to gave a reasonable response and didn’t appear to have taken it the way you did.
2nd comment … Again - not personalized and implies nothing more than what it plainly says.
Find someone else to pick a fight with.
I’m pretty sure I can hold my own.No picking, but tit for tat is what you will get.
Making someone’s life hell because they testify against you seems pretty illegal. Are you saying NASCAR would commit illegal acts?
Making someone’s life hell because they testify against you seems pretty illegal. Are you saying NASCAR would commit illegal acts?
Younger fans don't know that Nascar has been keeping teams in line for years. Before they had timing lines in the pits, they had stop watches. You could bet if one of their drivers was acting up it was a guaranteed speeding penalty coming. Today because of betting they don't do that. What they do though is find something wrong with the car during inspections.Yup. It's called retaliation lol
Naw, I'm surprised. I thought you were a real fan of Nascar.I hope they get their ass kicked in court.
If only I cared about what you thoughtNaw, I'm surprised. I thought you were a real fan of Nascar.
Nope ol' blunderbuss is going to blunder no matter what. Lol.If only I cared about what you thought![]()
I suppose that makes sense to you.Nope ol' blunderbuss is going to blunder no matter what. Lol.
I hope they get their ass kicked in court.
I can't speak for @BobbyFord, but I'm a real fan of the sport of Nascar. That doesn't make me a fan of the monopoly of Nascar, or the owners of Nascar. There is a difference.Naw, I'm surprised. I thought you were a real fan of Nascar.
I'm not seeing the monopoly thing. Nascar isn't stopping anybody from racing in those other series.I agree with the tweet to a certain point... the ruling on expedited discovery does seem like a minor skirmish, compared to the substance of the November 4 hearing on the injunction. However, even that argument, scheduled for next Monday, is hardly the litmus test of this lawsuit, IMO.
The judge is going to have to rule, sooner or later, on the definition of the relevant market. Are we talking about professional stock car racing, as 23XI and Front Row propose? Or is the relevant market defined as Nascar suggests... all sports and entertainment... presumably including IndyCar, F1, NHRA, Supercross, Monster Trucks, NFL, March Madness, UFC fights, Taylor Swift concerts, on and on. That ruling to define the relevant market will be the big battle with real blood. Up to then, it's just preliminary sparring over small details, IMO.
I can't speak for @BobbyFord, but I'm a real fan of the sport of Nascar. That doesn't make me a fan of the monopoly of Nascar, or the owners of Nascar. There is a difference.
I'm also a fan of the history of Nascar and of the France family. But building a great dynasty does not give the Frances unfettered monopoly power in the face of a changed economic world. Just my opinion.
“The charter agreements are a joke” is too vague for you?Have no idea what he's inferring. None. Too vague.
Does that mean he isn't going to take and spend his charter money? Maybe hire a good comedian?“The charter agreements are a joke” is too vague for you?
Shocker.
Do we even know whos getting what in the deal? And in reality only one charter appears to be sold right nowDoes that mean he isn't going to take and spend his charter money? Maybe hire a good comedian?
He’s saving up to pay Donny Schatz’ 2025 tire bill.Does that mean he isn't going to take and spend his charter money?
Multi millions should cover it. The charters are already sold. Waiting on approval by Nascar. Probably might be why Smoke isn't happy. He can see the money, but he can't spend it.Do we even know whos getting what in the deal? And in reality only one charter appears to be sold right now
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk