sdj
Just a race fan
Hooters was on Loy Allen's car too. Just sayin'
True, but, I remember that sponsor because of him. For a one horse team he was very good.
Hooters was on Loy Allen's car too. Just sayin'
I agree. This story wont repeat for a very long time if ever. I was thereHis story is the stuff Halls of Fame are made of.
I agree. This story wont repeat for a very long time if ever. I was there
that fateful day in Atl, Nov. 1992. The race for the ages.
Yep, we were on the back straight stands coming out of T2.I was there also, went to the concert the night before honoring Petty. The group Alabama performed. Somewhere I still have my ticket autographed by the King. That was a fantastic race, and the grandstands were packed. There were Fords, Chevys, Olds, Buicks and Pontiacs in the field, and no two looked alike. What a day.
Yep, we were on the back straight stands coming out of T2.
Those Apache (looking) helicopters following Petty around the
parade laps was awesome. They were sooooo low ![/QUOTE
That's crazy! We were on the backstretch about 15 rows up right out of turn 2. The Apaches were awesome. Somewhere in my junk I have a poster that DuPont was passing out in the infield, it has a rendering of the #24 Lumina, and all the DuPont color codes on it. Plus a rendering of JG and that cheezy mustache. One of these days when I keel over, I hope my kids will go through my junk, might find something worthwhile.
To me the answer is No. One season shouldn't be enough to get in and the main problem i've had with the HOF since the beginning is it's not exclusive enough.
Ray Evernham is in.
Ron Hornaday is in.
really?
In time, Alan K get's in, as it should be. Hell of a story there. Plus with "HOOTERS" on the car, I mean, come on.
Don't forget the #1 of Rick Mast either. He had my favorite Hooters pain scheme.
I think Gant was fourth in the standings, seemed a great, but very odd yearNot that any of this was Kulwicki's problem, but 1992 was a VERY down year for NASCAR performance. Dale Earnhardt and Rusty Wallace's seasons were among the worst of their careers, Mark Martin had a so-so year, Ricky Rudd took a step back, Ernie Irvan and Dale Jarrett had yet to assert their prowess, the next batch of superstars wasn't there yet. Even in championship contention, none of the points leader's seasons were stellar. Kulwicki's 4078 points was the lowest total EVER for a champion under the Latford System, and would have only been good enough for fourth place in the season before and after. From 1998 through 2001, I think each champion scored more than a 1000 more points than Kulwicki did in 1992. That championship was a Christmas miracle, the like never to be seen again.
Let me get this right...
AK basically started a CUP team with nothing
AK was an owner/driver champion
AK was the first northern born champion
AK coined the iconic "underbird"
AK is credited with creating the "Polish Victory Lap"
AK landed Hooters as a sponsor...would they have been in NASCAR without him?
AK at the time won the closest championship in NASCAR Cup history during one of the most memorable races ever.
AK brought back "Mighty Mouse"
AK was the "My Way" guy
AK died as the current Cup champion
AK was a fan favorite because of his dedication, work ethic and lifestyle.
Yes, I was always a huge AK fan and think he deserves a place in NASCAR's Hall of Fame at some point.
I think Gant was fourth in the standings, seemed a great, but very odd year
I can see the argument for Evernham in one way but also to me he was'nt a "star" per say of the sport. I can undertsnad your reasoning. i still disagree hes a Hall of Famers.Ray Evernham won three Cup titles as a crew chief and a butt load of races, including two Daytona 500's. two Brickyard 400's, two Coke 600's and four Southern 500s. He also brought a manufacturer back to the sport from scratch and won races as a car owner. Maybe more importantly, he was perhaps the prototype for the modern crew chief and changed the game in so many ways. A lot of things we take for granted now are because Ray did them first. In my opinion, Evernham is among the top half dozen crew chiefs to ever sit on the box. I have zero problem with him being in the Hall. Ron Hornaday is the king of the Truck Series. You can argue that his accomplishments there don't equate to Cup level achievement, but unless the hall wants to make separate categories for different NASCAR divisions, (which I would be fine with) how can you exclude Hornaday from the Hall?
Yea, I get your position from prior posts.All well and fine, but only the first two items listed would have ANY influence on me if I were voting on HoF membership.
Just another sob story at the end of the jack handle.Yea, I get your position from prior posts.
What is your take on Wendell Scott, should he have been inducted?
Being a 'northern born champion' isn't a factor in my book.Let me get this right...
AK basically started a CUP team with nothing
AK was an owner/driver champion
AK was the first northern born champion
AK coined the iconic "underbird"
AK is credited with creating the "Polish Victory Lap"
AK landed Hooters as a sponsor...would they have been in NASCAR without him?
AK at the time won the closest championship in NASCAR Cup history during one of the most memorable races ever.
AK brought back "Mighty Mouse"
AK was the "My Way" guy
AK died as the current Cup champion
AK was a fan favorite because of his dedication, work ethic and lifestyle.
Yes, I was always a huge AK fan and think he deserves a place in NASCAR's Hall of Fame at some point.
It's not called the Cup Series Hall of Fame, it's called the NASCAR Hall of Fame.I can see the argument for Evernham in one way but also to me he was'nt a "star" per say of the sport. I can undertsnad your reasoning. i still disagree hes a Hall of Famers.
As per Hornaday he was a truck series driver. Not the top level. No one should get in hall of fame based on truck series accomplishments or Xfinity series either. Hall of Famers should be Cup Series.
Certainly can't argue with that. I never said that was the list to get him into the Hall. Just things I remember about him.Being a 'northern born champion' isn't a factor in my book.
A victory celebration isn't grounds for HoF.
I dunno what the 'Mighty Mouse' connection is. If he "brought back" (from where?), then it's gone back again since.
Would Hooters have been in the sport without him? You could ask that about any number of sponsors he (and others) haven't brought to the sport.
"My Way" guy? A nickname isn't justification either.
Dying as champion isn't grounds either. I'm sorry I never got to see him race, but that's purely a sentimental factor.
Fan favorite? If any of those criteria get him in besides owner/driver of a self-started team, that will be the one.
I am definitely NOT saying he shouldn't be in (and not saying he should). I'm only saying that on that list of criteria, most of them don't support entry in my book.
I can see the argument for Evernham in one way but also to me he was'nt a "star" per say of the sport. I can undertsnad your reasoning. i still disagree hes a Hall of Famers.
As per Hornaday he was a truck series driver. Not the top level. No one should get in hall of fame based on truck series accomplishments or Xfinity series either. Hall of Famers should be Cup Series.
Uh, Chase Elliott?...and don't forget about Hooters sponsoring Brett Bodine.
...and Greg Biffle at the Cup level.
Others at the truck and busch level.
I can see the argument for Evernham in one way but also to me he was'nt a "star" per say of the sport. I can undertsnad your reasoning. i still disagree hes a Hall of Famers.
As per Hornaday he was a truck series driver. Not the top level. No one should get in hall of fame based on truck series accomplishments or Xfinity series either. Hall of Famers should be Cup Series.
Yea, I get your position from prior posts.
What is your take on Wendell Scott, should he have been inducted?
Ron Hornaday's biggest influence on the sport may well have been off the track. The Hornaday's opened their home to a number of up-and-coming young drivers, including future champions Jimmie Johnson and Kevin Harvick. Having a free home base allowed those drivers to concentrate more on building their careers and less on how they would support themselves. HoF administrators have often joked that Hornaday's guest room couch belongs in the building almost as much as some of the cars.To me the answer is No. One season shouldn't be enough to get in and the main problem i've had with the HOF since the beginning is it's not exclusive enough.
Ray Evernham is in.
Ron Hornaday is in.
really?
Regarding Evernham, for about five years, he was a bigger star than 75% of the drivers. Heck, he was the first crew chief I know of that had his own sponsorship deals. As I said, I will agree that dumping ALL NASCAR people into the same bucket is full of pitfalls, but that is what they did, so you HAVE to include drivers from lower series, crew chiefs, car owners, etc.
If the HoF is just for Cup drivers, its gonna be a very small HoF. They're already up to Jeff Gordon, so they're going to have to go back and really start re evaluating a bunch if drivers. I hope they will recognize all the touring series. Tell the stories of Jack Ingram, Red Farmer, Tommy Houston and guys like those. All those Cup drivers had to come from somewhere. If I ever went to the HoF, I'd want to see more than Petty, Earnhardt and Gordon. The HoF should tell an abundance of stories. Not just the superstars.
Any of them that live in Concord.Personally I prefer grapes, is there a driver no matter the series that we can define as a grape?
This thread has been something else since yesterday. Our resident racing experts/insiders were laying absolute haymakers on the jackman who took it like a champ and is back today for round 2Any of them that live in Concord.
I'm here all week.
This thread has been something else since yesterday. Our resident racing experts/insiders were laying absolute haymakers on the jackman who took it like a champ and is back today for round 2
You're my hero lol you took those personal shots and just kept trying to get your point across without losing your cool. Whether you were right or wrong on the HOF debate, you looked past the schoolyard bully tactics and tried to engage in a worthwhile conversation. That's all you can do on a internet message board.I've taken an awful lot haymakers over the years, which might explain a few things........
Another former champion that I think is a borderline HOF guy is Bobby Labonte. He only had two really good seasons (1999 and 2000), but never finished higher than 6th in points outside of that. He did also win a BGN title so that might put him over the top. I'd put Truex in the same category if he doesn't win another title.
Interesting point and I was actually thinking of Labonte while the sparring about AK was going on here yesterday, I think Bobby's case will have as much if not more debate. His 1999 season was incredible, 23 top 5 finishes and 26 top 10's! That's crazy consistencyJust depends on your point of view. Is the HOF only for longevity of really good? Brief spirts of elite? Or all encompassing? Not everyone can be Gordon, Petty or Earnhardt.
Bobby Labonte is an interesting case because his prime was a lot shorter than other champions. He didn’t land a full time Cup ride until age 29, ended up with Gibbs and won his first race at 31. He notched all 21 wins and his Cup title in an 8 year span, and was done winning by age 40. Had he landed at a team like RCR, rather than Petty, he likely had a few more wins in him. But agreed, his time at the top of the sport was short lived.
In my mind, Labonte was one of the top drivers of the late 90’s. Add on his Busch Series championship (he was the first to win the title in Busch and Cup) and I’d say he’s a rock solid HOF candidate. Others may disagree I’m sure.
Hmmm, maybe if it is Hooters orange?It's an apples to oranges comparison and NASCAR makes us put them in the same fruit basket. Hornaday is the best all time apple. Kulwicki is not the best all time orange.
Always had a respect for Harry, though '92 was about the time I started watching Nascar at the end of his career. That Skoal bandit was iconicOther than the number of wins, 2 VS 5, Gant had almost a carbon copy of his 1991 season and he ended up with almost the exact same number of points and was fourth both years. Gant's final two years as a driver were not nearly as good. Age may have been some of it, but I think the loss of Andy Petree to RCR was a bigger reason.