- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 38,590
- Points
- 1,033
Biff to the clown car.
Your disbelief was justified.Biffle to the #5.
I can't believe get to be the first one to post it.
Biff to the clown car.
Your disbelief was justified.Biffle to the #5.
I can't believe get to be the first one to post it.
When did the #5 become known as the 'clown car'? I missed the memo (again).Your disbelief was justified.
Yesterday. So named because of the large number or people currently in it, including yourself if I remember correctly.When did the #5 become known as the 'clown car'? I missed the memo (again).
Same as regular clown shoes but with oversized heat shields. The hard part is getting all the HANS devices connected.Yesterday. So named because of the large number or people currently in it, including yourself if I remember correctly.
What do clown driving shoes look like?
Both charters are being casually shopped. Neither team knows what they'll do. It's a very strange silly season.
1? Car by my math but who knows.....What's the value of a charter when the field is going to be short two cars anyway?
Whatever someone is willing to pay for it.What's the value of a charter when the field is going to be short two cars anyway?
1? Car by my math but who knows.....
-16
-15
-46
-7
+33?
+JTG?
+77
& ??????????
Whatever someone is willing to pay for it.
What's the value of a charter when the field is going to be short two cars anyway?
Charters were granted to all qualified owners on terms agreed to / insisted upon with and by the RTA. All current charter holders are members of the RTA.I think the MWR charters were sold for 5 million each but IDK how much less they would be worth today. Nascar botched the release of the charters giving just about everyone that wanted one right from the start and therefore watered the value down due to oversupply.
I think the MWR charters were sold for 5 million each but IDK how much less they would be worth today. Nascar botched the release of the charters giving just about everyone that wanted one right from the start and therefore watered the value down due to oversupply.
Charters were granted to all qualified owners on terms agreed to / insisted upon with and by the RTA. All current charter holders are members of the RTA.
See how that works?
I don't think along with Mr. France. He's a bit player in this deal anyway.I can dig it, man, but I still think Nascar went about it the wrong way as the halcyon days are long gone and instead of being a demand there is an oversupply. Maybe you and Brian think an oversupply is a good thing but I do not.
Charters have caused too much risk for new, uncharted teams to get in. This, combined with difficult times on the sponsorship market, could be a deadly combination. Add it to the list of destructive policies BF created in the name of making NASCAR "just like other sports."
BF rubber-stamped the charters. He had nothing to do with their creation or implementation.
The wealthy individuals who did those things have taken a rather longer view. In the meantime, a charter pays more week to week than a non-charter team earns. There's a method to the madness. They'll be down to 36 entries in due course each of which will be chartered. MLB. NFL. NBA. NHL. Soccer, Lacrosse and on and on ad infinitum.
BF rubber-stamped the charters. He had nothing to do with their creation or implementation.
The wealthy individuals who did those things have taken a rather longer view. In the meantime, a charter pays more week to week than a non-charter team earns. There's a method to the madness. They'll be down to 36 entries in due course each of which will be chartered. MLB. NFL. NBA. NHL. Soccer, Lacrosse and on and on ad infinitum.
BF rubber-stamped the charters. He had nothing to do with their creation or implementation.
Professionalism is creeping into the structure and management of our favourite sport.A strong leader could have put his foot down if he believed it was bad for the sport (think Bill Sr and Talladega 1969). BF doesn't get a pass in my book.
Or buys the family out.If the Jacksonville Jaguars and the Arizona Cardinals fold and go out of business at the end of this season, that has an immediate negative impact on the Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots and every other team in the league. That would be bad for them, they don't want that. The league, meaning the teams, would likely pool resources to keep endangered franchises afloat.
If Roush Fenway and pick another team, say RCR, go out of business, that is not necessarily bad for Hendrick, Gibbs, and Penske. Maybe it's an opening for them to lobby NASCAR to allow five cars per team to fill the field. The owners have a long, long way to go to create a franchise system that works as franchise systems are supposed to.
The 32 NFL teams share revenue heavily, and when one succeeds financially, they all benefit. They are truly invested in each others' success, and the team owners appoint a commissioner to oversee the sport who is their employee.
This will never happen in NASCAR. Can you imagine Brian France reporting to the team owners, who can fire him anytime they want? The only way it happens is if the RTA eventually walks on the Frances and creates their own series, like F1 constructors have threatened to do several times. Boy would that be a bloody mess.
Or buys the family out.
Back to the thread topic, Biffle is 47 years old. What is the big deal about getting cut loose? It does not go on forever.
Is 33 set in stone? I Googled around but can't find anything saying it is. That's the discrepancy between our numbers.
I don't think this is correct. Certainly the RTA initiated the concept and the process. But BZF and the Nascar shareholders (Jim France and Lesa France Kennedy) were crucial to the process actually advancing to the finish line. BZF was aware that his most strategic asset (supply of race teams to put on the weekly show) was at risk of drying up under the status quo. This risk had not existed since the early formative years of Nascar, but by 2015 it did exist in a very serious way. That is why the RTA found a receptive counter-party in Brian France and Nascar.BF rubber-stamped the charters. He had nothing to do with their creation or implementation.
You make a good point. He introduced the charters and then cashed out for $10 million.Looking back I think Rob Kauffman just wanted to get paid and somehow he convinced Nascar and the team owners that doing it the way they did was the right way. Will we ever see the day when there are less cars in the field then charters initially distributed? I have no way of knowing but I would not be surprised if it did happen that way.
BF rubber-stamped the charters. He had nothing to do with their creation or implementation.
I don't think this is correct. Certainly the RTA initiated the concept and the process. But BZF and the Nascar shareholders (Jim France and Lesa France Kennedy) were crucial to the process actually advancing to the finish line. BZF was aware that his most strategic asset (supply of race teams to put on the weekly show) was at risk of drying up under the status quo. This risk had not existed since the early formative years of Nascar, but by 2015 it did exist in a very serious way. That is why the RTA found a receptive counter-party in Brian France and Nascar.
You and I both..... I started with him back when he and Wayne Gapp were campaining those Mavericks in NHRA.... I have always appreciated Jack for his endeavors.... he pulled himself up by the bootstraps and made himself very successful... like you... it was one of my happiest days when he started a Winston Cup team with Mark... I was one of his biggest supporters through all the years until it started to look like he was giving Mark the shaft ..... I still appreciate him for what he has accomplished but... his decisions became questionable several years ago...... Allenbaba brought up some very good points.... I think Mark was a good enough driver to have won a championship..... but.... I don't think he can complain.... he had a very good run with Jack and made millions of dollars... what more can you ask? Jack owes a lot to Mark for helping him get his team off the ground...Mark had a lot of input as to who Jack hired for drivers but.. on the flipside Mark owes a tremendous debt to Jack for giving him a second chance.I've been a Roush fan since the IMSA/Trans Am days. I was thrilled when he decided to give NASCAR a shot with Mark. He succeeded in NASCAR like he did in everything else but alas, everything has to come to an end and I'm afraid this is it. Biff hung around way to long and I hope he has success like Kenseth and Edwards.
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Closing-Bell/2016/11/22/NASCAR.aspx
how long until RF is done?
They have been done since Mark, Kenseth and Edwards left.... Biffle was the last one to shut out the lights....http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Closing-Bell/2016/11/22/NASCAR.aspx
how long until RF is done?
Yep that is what it looks like. This is why ford signed shr they knew where this was headed and were facing a dodge moment. Biffle didn't stay their by choice, I am sure he took a big haircut in pay just to stay. Now there just isn't a deal for him anymore. Same reason Matt and carl left. Not enough sponsorship and not enough money. Biffle wanted to go to MWR but 3m went to Jeff Gordon insteadI read on Jayski that the main reason Biffle is leaving is because Roush doesn't have sponsorship for next year. He still had one year left on the contract.
Back to the thread topic, Biffle is 47 years old. What is the big deal about getting cut loose? It does not go on forever.
I don't think we have solid information on whether he quit or got cut. Thanks to a link posted by @Kiante we have this:He didn't get cut loose, he quit....
I don't think we have solid information on whether he quit or got cut. Thanks to a link posted by @Kiante we have this:
http://www.dalejr.com/radio/dbc/
Episode 43 at 42:50 clearly implies The Biff had no choice in the matter. But that's not authoritative either, I suppose.