mike honcho
Knuckleheads
Can't find it now but didn't somebody here post the number of passes for the first 2 races this year compared to last and they were lower this year?
Matt was the better driver, and he couldn't be passed.
I'm not sure what the network allowed you to see but I was actually there.You saw many but some were quality back and forth?Did you have your shoes off at the time so we could get to more than 10 at least?
Well stick around I'll be there in a couple weeks.I'm not sure what the network allowed you to see but I was actually there.
Sweet, then you'll see what you missed this past weekendWell stick around I'll be there in a couple weeks.
What about the at least 15 passes I saw for the lead?
Passing up at Las Vegas: NASCAR's new Gen-6 Sprint Cup race car racked up some impressive statistics in Sunday's race. The official race reports reads 22 lead changes among eight drivers, with the 22 lead changes being the most at Las Vegas since 2007, the year before the Gen-5 car (Car of Tomorrow) was introduced at intermediate race tracks. Beyond those numbers, NASCAR's loop data (stats measured at the 10 scoring loops around the 1.5-mile track) showed a phenomenal 2,342 green-flag passes throughout the race, compared with 1,301 last year. In addition, there were 31 green-flag passes for the lead (including intra-lap passes scored at loops other than the finish line), the most since NASCAR started recording loop data in 2005.(NASCAR Wire Service)(3-11-2013)
Damn those pesky facts
I'm not sure what the network allowed you to see but I was actually there.
Seriously, I was out of my seat a lot of the time. It sucks that the networks cannot provide better coverage. We all know that a lot is missed through television.I do wish the network would focus more on the racing in the pack, because that sure got you excited.
Hell a Ford just sniffing a Top 10 gets him excited.I do wish the network would focus more on the racing in the pack, because that sure got you excited.
Can't find it now but didn't somebody here post the number of passes for the first 2 races this year compared to last and they were lower this year?
Seriously, I was out of my seat a lot of the time. It sucks that the networks cannot provide better coverage. We all know that a lot is missed through television.
Thanks.Time to fire up the Heli.Isn't it funny how the numbers change AFTER somebody calls out the car????????2012/2013
Daytona 500: 7449/6896
Phoenix I: 1995/1213
Las Vegas: 1301/2342
Not disagreeing with the above but they also have Pirellis that have three different levels of softness or degradation. It isnt perfect but I do think the various cycles makes it more interesting, and Pirellis PR or image is surviving well in spite of some F1 specs prescribing some degradation.There is just a whole lot of people on here that don't understand racing, and don't know the history of racing. Look at formula 1..they have so much downforce, the car can run upside down, tires twice as wide as nascar, telemetry out the wazoo. May be two passes for the lead a race. Car out front in clean air has a huge advantage..these are little bity cars half the weight as a nascar. They have recently..because of no passing made huge changes. They have a device that stores energy and a flap on the wing that opens and closes. The cars behind the leader can use this advantage to try to catch and pass the leader..doesn't work that great. Indy cars have "push to pass" this gives the button pusher more RPM to help in passing, doesn't work that great either, you only get so many button pushes and it doesn't work anymore. If you want a lot of passes, go fire up your playstation,
How does your theory hold up when Kyle came from 20th to the front after the pit road penalty? Kyle wasn't running half a second faster when he went past the top 10 cars.someone mentioned how does the leader pass or have an advantage once the field gets strung out with lap cars. the reason is the leader is probably running at least half a second faster than a lap car. half a second faster is fast enough to overcome the advantage the lead car has in turbulent air...
That's my point. Kyle was on the same tires and still drove from 20th to the front under green past the top 10 cars. Kyle didnt pass the cars bunched up, he passed them one at a time on the same tires.
Here's my point of view: I'm guessing the TV coverage wasn't very good because if you were actually AT the race then most of the opinions posted here regarding passing and aero wouldn't be here. I saw A LOT of passing. I saw cars that could pass top 10 cars WHEREVER they wanted. I listened to no less than 15 different team frequencies. None of the drivers that I listened were talking about aero anything. Most were talking about tight or loose with regard to set-up, not clean or dirty air.
Are the Gen-6 cars more aerodynamic than a 1948 Buick? The answer is yes. Is the car an improvement aerodynamically in terms of better racing than last year's car? The answer is yes.
I've been at Vegas the past six years and this is the best racing I've seen yet. By far the most passing I've seen all around the track. There were several grooves in one and two, as opposed to three grooves last year, I believe it's the car and not the tire. The three and four groove pretty much remained the same as year.
Attend a race before you criticize the racing quality of the Gen-6 car (plate racing not included.)
KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE DOUBLE FILE RESTARTS. how much passing would there be in these races if we went back to single file?? if you watch most of the passing happens right after restarts or I would say at least half of it does. .
It was upper 70's on SundayHow cold was it at the track?I checked on my phone and it told me about 4 degrees C. That would have had an impact on tyres I would have thought, and the milage there referring to.
Not disagreeing with the above but they also have Pirellis that have three different levels of softness or degradation. It isnt perfect but I do think the various cycles makes it more interesting, and Pirellis PR or image is surviving well in spite of some F1 specs prescribing some degradation.
Ehhh I used to love when a team could short pit,put on a set of tires and run up thru the field.Can't do that with these tires.Yeah, I think they are made to run two different tires on a dry track, and the third is for the rain. It for sure livens up the formulas races. But also, they have a completely different(boring) pit setup, cars can't speed, internal jacks on the cars with a guy at all four wheels and only one nut to tighten, they don't have many chances to screw up a pit stop. Not as good as a Nascar race in my opinion. Don't know if you remember a few years back that Nascar mandated smaller fuel tanks to try to stop fuel mileage races. I think softer tires would result in the same problem, mainly more pit stops and less racing. I think if anything, using the harder tire is a big plus because teams gamble with the tires, some take two insides, or two outsides, or even like Kenseh, don't take any and gamble on staying out front.
I didn't hear Kasey say anything about aero being the reason he couldn't get around Matt. Matt or Kyle would've gotten around Kasey if it were reversed. The fact that Kasey wasn't the right guy for the job doesn't mean that the car was the cause.
Shoulda coulda woulda doesn't win races, drivers like Matt Kenseth win races.
Toadie kings have exceptional hearing.I did.
Link?I did.
Link?
I watched the post-race and what I got out of it is he said Matt drove perfectly and didn't make any mistakes.If you watched the race on TV, you wouldn't need a link. You would have seen it happening in realtime.
I watched his postrace, and he talked about how Matt was smart running across his nose and making him tight or loose. Then he did a garage interview and said how Matts moves took the air off his splitter and he would lose momentum.
What I get out of that is you don't understand Chevy drivers to good.I watched the post-race and what I got out of it is he said Matt drove perfectly and didn't make any mistakes.
Perhaps. It seemed more to me that Kasey didn't understand Matt KensethWhat I get out of that is you don't understand Chevy drivers to good.
That is still the case pretty much at short tracks. If there is a late caution at Bristol, unless they all come in, the end of the top ten and farther back will be going for it. Don't think it is that great an idea to be fooling with too soft tires at the speeds they run on a larger track. As it is now, teams have the choice as to how much tape they run on the tire fan ducts, and they also have fans to use or not to cool the tires, it will become more of a factor when it gets hotter and stays that way.Ehhh I used to love when a team could short pit,put on a set of tires and run up thru the field.Can't do that with these tires.
I'm curious to see how this car will run at Bristol