StandOnIt
Farm Truck
I see opportunities for Wallace with a lower tier team, like at a Petty level or JTG.
I remember when Kahne came in to Nascar off of the dirt. Could have changed the number to the 42 and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference, he ran up high and he was fast and a contender. Personality was different too. I don't know when was the last time I have seen him belly laugh. He is painful to watch and a terrible interview. Sorry current fans but I used to be a Kahne fan myself. He drove a Dodge.
Ok I have a question to all the NASCAR gods! Ok here it is, ever since the 22 team got caught with whateva they was doing to there car they haven't ran good at all.. it was one time I looked on the screen st Kentucky and he was mid 20's I mean they haven't been nowhere close to what they once was! So my question is it really the driver or all car?? This is why I made this thread to begin with.. before I started watching the sport I really thought it was a level playing field and the person behind the wheel is what won the race. But the more and more I watch it's like it's all crew chiefs and and engineers are the ones that's really winning on Saturday and sundays and not the drivers.. it's like what ever team have the best tech and engineers are the ones thats going to win.. so what are we really watching these days? To me it seems like crew and engineers battle every week not drivers
I'm not just talking bout the logano at Kentucky though I said he hasn't rah well since they caught them doing whateva they was doing ..another thing, Logano got caught, but what you don't know is probably some other teams were doing the same thing or similar, so the jig is up on that little mod Nascar is going to be looking for that. So sometimes it isn't just Logano that has to change up the car.
Ok thank you , but I wasn't just talking bout him. I was just going off of him.. for you read my whole post? What do you think of whole ?as you can see here, he has had three crashes in the last 9 races, those kill your points.
http://www.racing-reference.info/drivdet/loganjo01/2017/W
he ran third in Michigan..look at his finishes there, he runs well at Michigan
http://www.racing-reference.info/rquery?id=loganjo01&trk=058&series=W
Ok ok cool thanks for your opinionyou form your own opinion. Mine is sometimes it IS the car, Sometimes it isn't, and sometimes it is both. But everybody is working their tales off..some more than others. There is no "right" answer. But all of them have better tracks than others. Darell Waltrip won Bristol 7 times in a row.
you form your own opinion. Mine is sometimes it IS the car, Sometimes it isn't, and sometimes it is both. But everybody is working their tales off..some more than others. There is no "right" answer. But all of them have better tracks than others. Darell Waltrip won Bristol 7 times in a row.
Ok thank you , but I wasn't just talking bout him. I was just going off of him.. for you read my whole post? What do you think of whole ?
Some folks will disagree with this but from different interviews and articles I have read over the years about Nascar the tracks that take the most complete set of driver skills are short tracks and road courses.
Unless JLo is running up front I don't pay much attention to him but there are so many variables that go into where a driver finishes it is hard to pin it on one thing. I think he is a good driver and can really maximize the car's potential if it is running well but I think he lacks the ability to get good finishes if the car is not what it should be. I am sure whatever Penske was busted for has hurt the performance of the 2 & 22 and the team is trying to figure out a way to get an advantage back. This is all just my opinion and I don't think you will ever get a definitive answer.
Thanks for the response bro.. I just like to hear people views on thisSome folks will disagree with this but from different interviews and articles I have read over the years about Nascar the tracks that take the most complete set of driver skills are short tracks and road courses.
Unless JLo is running up front I don't pay much attention to him but there are so many variables that go into where a driver finishes it is hard to pin it on one thing. I think he is a good driver and can really maximize the car's potential if it is running well but I think he lacks the ability to get good finishes if the car is not what it should be. I am sure whatever Penske was busted for has hurt the performance of the 2 & 22 and the team is trying to figure out a way to get an advantage back. This is all just my opinion and I don't think you will ever get a definitive answer.
I will put it this way. If Jimmie Johnson was in the 78 he would probably lap the field in most races.
I think the 48 driver may be on the backside of his career. He will still win but they are going to get fewer and fewer as time goes on. Hope I’m wrong though...You would think that the 48 would be up to par ... considering the vast resources available. Heck ..... the 24 seems to be running quite well.
I think the 48 driver may be on the backside of his career. He will still win but they are going to get fewer and fewer as time goes on. Hope I’m wrong though...
It is a possibility that the fire is going out .......... a wife and kids can do that to a guy
Sure. And age....his CC too....
It is a possibility that the fire is going out .......... a wife and kids can do that to a guy
yeah I said 75/25% car in Truex's case. With a multi car team is is easier to gauge the car or the driver IMO. Harvick, KDB, Johnson, Larson it's the driver. Penske next year should be interesting, should be pretty closeMostly car. Some drivers suck so bad they can't win in anything (Danica) but no way Truex was only good enough to win 3 races in a decade but now he suddenly got better at driving and can win a race a month.
how many of these threads are we gonna have
how many of these threads are we gonna have
I just think the 78 car has got better from all the notes from the Gibbs organization and they hit on something nobody has.. really don't think it's Truex all of a suddenThere's still a big difference between an average driver and a good/great one. Look at the 18 car going from JJ Yeley to Kyle Busch, the 5 car from Casey Mears to Mark Martin, the 78 from Regan Smith to Kurt Busch, etc......instant results (dramatic performance improvement) as soon as a better driver got in the car
All the drivers has stated countless times.. the 78 get everything from them and they have the same thing the 78 has.. meaning that the 78 is getting all the good stuff just like Gibbs drivers are.. I think they hit on one lil thing that the Gibbs drivers hasn't , well we all know they hit on something lol.. they wasn't this good before they lined up with Gibbs!78 get the chassis from Jibbs and they hangs their own bodies.
Well said.. I wasn't watching back when Kyle drove for Hendrick but didn't he win some races for them ?Put Jimmie Johnson or Kyle Busch in the 37 or similar and they will win exactly 0 races.
Put Chris Buscher in the 48 or 18 and he will be in contention every week.
A great driver is just another piece of the puzzle. 48 has half the wins without Chad Knaus, IMO. 48 also would have half the wins with a driver not named Jimmie Johnson. It's the team put together the way it is that gets the W's. Where was the supposed GOAT Kyle Busch when he was driving for Hendrick? Not racking up a ton of wins, that's for sure. But driving for Gibbs, he is arguably top-2 or 3 active on the circuit.
It's the whole package. But without a great car, you don't even get a chance.
A total of 4 wins over 3 years. Nothing to sneeze at, for sure, but it's nothing compared to his performance at Gibbs. He won 8 races in his first year at Gibbs. The team is always going to be a major factor.Well said.. I wasn't watching back when Kyle drove for Hendrick but didn't he win some races for them ?