Owners to NASCAR: Pick up the pace

FLRacingFan

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
39,827
Points
1,033
Location
Florida
Teams frustrated over sport’s inability to shake up the business
By Adam Stern, Staff Writer

https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com...5/14/Leagues-and-Governing-Bodies/NASCAR.aspx

Growing tension has emerged between NASCAR and its teams despite efforts to collaborate more in recent years.

NASCAR stakeholders have worked to improve the team owner model to make the sport more valuable to current investors and attractive to prospects. That included implementing the charter system in 2016 for team owners in the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series to form enterprise value. It’s also included working collaboratively on issues ranging from marketing, to rules changes, to controlling costs.

But several team owners and their top executives are frustrated by the slow pace of change, which has strained their relationship with NASCAR. This comes as this year’s season has seen a continued drop in attendance and ratings, which has ratcheted up the pressure for more dramatic change.

It also comes as the sport faces critical negotiations in the next couple of years.

NASCAR’s France family has been eyeing a sale of a stake of the company and has hired Goldman Sachs to assist. The first term of the charter agreement between NASCAR and teams ends in 2020, which could spur talks on how the sport distributes media revenue. And the five-year sanction agreements between NASCAR and tracks also end in 2020, opening up the possibility of major changes to the sport’s schedule.

“For a sport based on speed, it’s ironic that we are not nimble and fast enough to quickly make changes,” Andrew Murstein, majority owner of Richard Petty Motorsports, wrote in an email. “I believe we are moving forward and are on the right path … but I would like to see it happen sooner rather than later.”

The environment is so sensitive that most team executives and people close to them either declined comment or offered only to speak on background. NASCAR did not comment for this story.

The issues causing frustration include cost controls, the feeling from some that NASCAR needs to run fewer or shorter races and do so at different venues, questions about NASCAR’s long-term management plan, and a perceived lack of cohesiveness over new initiatives.

One example of the frustration was evident after NASCAR made an unexpected announcement last month that it was purchasing the smaller ARCA stock car racing series. Rob Kauffman, co-owner of Chip Ganassi Racing and chairman of the Race Team Alliance, tweeted after the announcement, “Wow. @NASCAR consolidating monopoly power. Need to check @RaceTeamAllianc legal #thesqueezeiscoming.”

Kauffman wouldn’t elaborate on the tweet, but sources familiar with his thinking said the hashtag was a reference to the possibility that teams could fight to reset the sport’s current revenue-distribution model after 2020. The expiring charter agreement and track sanction deals combine to make 2020 clearly one of the most pivotal years in the sport’s history. While there are questions about how much leverage teams would have, more extreme options could be to strike or form a breakaway series.

NASCAR’s purchase of ARCA has led some to question the motive behind the move. NASCAR’s premier series teams are barred under the charter from joining other U.S.-based stock car racing series, sources said. Taking ARCA out of the picture would make it much more challenging for renegade NASCAR teams to break away and start a rival series at the end of the charter, since they would have to start from scratch.

One team executive said that while the potential to renegotiate the sport’s revenue split is a sexy topic, it’s just one of three major pillars on which teams are focused.

The second is to slash expenses and do more joint marketing. NASCAR has started to implement some cost-cutting measures, such as moving to universal air wrenches. But even that has led to issues, with some teams accusing the new spec pit guns of malfunctioning. Team owner Joe Gibbs said he told NASCAR he wasn’t a fan of the new rule. Joe Gibbs Racing reportedly spent heavily to develop faster air guns for quicker pit stops.

Sources said multiple team owners have pushed NASCAR’s leadership, led primarily by President Brent Dewar and COO Steve Phelps, for greater change. Teams are working particularly hard to find ways to lower costs, and some even want to introduce a budget cap on how much teams can spend per car annually. A team source involved with meetings between the teams and NASCAR pegged the potential cap at between $15 million and $20 million per car, but questions remain about whether owners truly could agree on a cap and how NASCAR would govern it.

A budget cap is one aspect of the wider topic of the competitive framework of the sport, which has been an important topic of late in Team Owner Council meetings and RTA discussions.

One executive with a long history in motorsports is not surprised at the recent tension, especially as the business metrics around the sport continue to be challenged.

“This is a natural progression of the maturation of the sport, and is something that’s happened in every other league,” said Lauri Eberhart, co-founder of the Apollo Sports & Entertainment Law Group and a former executive vice president and general counsel for racetrack owner Speedway Motorsports Inc. “When you look at it, you get to a point where the players or teams are saying, ‘We are not making enough money; somebody else is, so let’s look at the revenue-stream splits and all work it out.’ It’s something that’s happening as we grow and as the sport’s metrics continue to be under pressure.”

Among the most pressing issues for teams is the continued reliance on corporate sponsorship for about 75 percent of their annual revenue, at a time when teams are having to drop prices and work harder to land or renew ever-smaller deals.

This has hastened teams’ desire to change the sport’s revenue-distribution model. Under the current revenue split from media rights dollars, tracks earn 65 percent of the pie, while teams earn 25 percent and NASCAR takes the remaining 10 percent. Fox Sports and NBC Sports pay a combined $820 million annually for media rights.

Meanwhile, while innovation, experimentation and disruption are buzzwords throughout sports, team executives are frustrated by the sport’s inability to change, such as trying midweek Monster Energy Series races. Some believe the series could have tested these as early as this year, but now, with the 2019 schedule already out, there won’t be any until 2020 at the earliest.

NASCAR driver Kurt Busch recently hit on the topic on SirusXM NASCAR Radio, saying, “We need to shake up our schedule. … We’ve got to do more things for our fans, more things for the media, to keep things more interesting and exciting when we’re moving and shaking.”

In NASCAR’s defense, sources say some senior executives at the sanctioning body are interested in trying midweek races; the opposition appears to mostly be coming from track owners fearful of losing ticket revenue. There also have been instances where NASCAR has appeared frustrated with the slow pace of change of other stakeholders, such as when NASCAR competition executive Steve O’Donnell tweeted two weeks ago that having no Monster Energy Series drivers race in the second-tier Xfinity Series “should be the norm.” Some Xfinity teams have resisted such an idea because they leverage appearances and name recognition by Monster Energy Series drivers to help sell sponsorships, even though that has diluted the series’ developmental mantra.

Team executives are more interested in experimenting with a midweek race to increase TV ratings than concerned about possibly lower attendance, the latter of which being tracks’ main opposition.

“The midweek racing idea has been kicked around for a long time; TV likes it, tracks hate it,” Kauffman told SportsBusiness Journal in April. “For teams, it’s just a matter of scheduling. We’re happy to try it.”

Some team executives are now turning their attention toward getting midweek dates on the 2020 schedule. The thought has been to try them at tracks that are closer to cities and thus less dependent on camping revenue than more rural tracks.

“My to-do list if I were in charge in no particular order would be: No. 1, more night and mid-week races. I don’t care what the excuses are. Let’s just get it done,” Murstein wrote. “No. 2, measures to level the playing field. The same people basically win every week. It gets boring. … There needs to be similar equipment for everyone. What other sport league has teams build their own equipment?”

NASCAR also is working on giving the sport a more cohesive marketing structure, as it recently announced it’s looking at changing its title sponsorship model in 2020 and working more closely with teams, tracks and media partners to jointly sell and promote the sport. But not all team executives are thrilled by that concept, either, as some fear that an expanded NASCAR sponsor roster would limit marketing prospects for teams.

When it comes to having more cohesive collaboration, Kauffman was quick to point out that the new youth-based esports initiative announced last week by NASCAR and iRacing included no involvement from teams. He added that NASCAR has not helped the RTA with its own esports initiative, which is a pro iRacing league featuring players who would be drafted by the actual teams.

“They just weren’t interested in working with us and aggressively smothered our initiative,” Kauffman said.

While years ago the hope of more collaboration through the charter system and the launch of the RTA seemed promising, it’s proved harder to execute based on various stakeholders’ self interests.

“The tension has always been there because business people are self-interested and in the room to make money, but on the other hand, everyone has to work together or it’s not going to work,” Eberhart said. “But the stress on the industry players is increasing because the metrics continue to trend down. That’s going to put anyone in the industry under additional stress.”
 
I was really young when it happened and maybe speaking out of turn, but this is looking and starting to feel like the CART/Indy Car split

I feel the same...posted that somewhere. I think she's gonna blow!
 
Interesting.
The problem with guys like Kauffman and Murstein is that they don't have the sport's best interests at heart.
But they reduce travel and insurance costs.....because billionaires care about these things.
Interesting.
The problem with guys like Kauffman and Murstein is that they don't have the sport's best interests at heart.
I agree. They have the owners interests at heart. This is only 1/2 of the equation.....just like IndyCar. Hmmmmm.
 
“My to-do list if I were in charge in no particular order would be: No. 1, more night and mid-week races. I don’t care what the excuses are. Let’s just get it done,” Murstein wrote. “No. 2, measures to level the playing field. The same people basically win every week. It gets boring. … There needs to be similar equipment for everyone. What other sport league has teams build their own equipment?”
,
This quote is scary for the future of Nascar. Is he suggesting something along the lines of everyone run the same car, built by Nascar? Why is it so hard to understand that the best teams with the best people should get the lions share of the wins? If you want to win more, work harder and become the best!
 
These two guys scare me with comments like

"The same people basically win every week, it gets boring"
"There needs to be similar equipment for everyone"
"There needs to be more night races"

I thought B France was out of touch with reality, but I am thinking not as much as these guys.
 
These two guys scare me with comments like

"The same people basically win every week, it gets boring"
"There needs to be similar equipment for everyone"
"There needs to be more night races"

I thought B France was out of touch with reality, but I am thinking not as much as these guys.

All three of these scare me. Night races are boring. The cars are pretty similar. And these guys need to man up and do their homework since they're upset that Harvick's whipping that ass.
 
Night races are boring.
I have a couple of complaints with night racing, but I don't know that anything about the racing itself is inherently more or less entertaining than a day race under otherwise similar conditions.

Good luck selling fans on reincarnating Cup as the second coming of IROC, or the tracks on weeknights. NASCAR might get track buy-in if they tried the same thing IndyCar does in ... Detroit? I think that's it. They run two races on consecutive days. Maybe back-to-back 250 or 300-milers on Wednesday and Thursday would work. Finishing order of the first race is starting order of the second, but otherwise they're two separate races, each with the usual points awarded.
 
Last edited:
Kaufman has become enough of a loose cannon that it is clear he isn't running the RTA show. He was instrumental in starting and shaping it, but people currently in power don't talk like that. It's more like he's signed up to play bad cop.

I'm sure many people in the industry are growing restless and uncomfortable with the signs of economic and viewership contraction. But there seem to be as many different contradictory desires for "changes" floating around as there are on a forum like this. More night races? Seriously? What night? The sport runs on TV money, and Saturday night races are a ratings disaster as compared to Sunday afternoon. Maybe they should try mid-week, but that is a real shot in the dark.

Many believe the sport is being dominated too much by a few teams and drivers. Maybe that is true on some level, but solving it requires a different long term approach, not "we must change faster!". More to the point, the drivers who are currently dominating don't create compelling narrative for casual fans to latch onto. But again, that isn't something you fix quickly.
 
I think Murstein invested in the wrong sport if he thinks that's going to happen.

Does he not realize that its not as simple as throwing money at a team to move it to the front?

I guess he wasn't there when Red Bull tried that nonsense and failed at it.
 
I guess some people are scared of the dark or something. :idunno: Summertime night racing under the stars? Good stuff.
Eh. Too long a day for my candy @$$ these days. Too much time in the parking lot, too long a drive home when I'm tired and / or too much extra expense for the hotel room.
 
I'm not sure what that means. What's a 'compelling narrative', in racing terms?

I think you probably know on some level. Why are some drivers exponentially more popular than others with similar talents? Storylines are needed to create big audiences in sports. There are only so many hardcore technical racing fans.
 
Kaufman has become enough of a loose cannon that it is clear he isn't running the RTA show. He was instrumental in starting and shaping it, but people currently in power don't talk like that. It's more like he's signed up to play bad cop.

I'm sure many people in the industry are growing restless and uncomfortable with the signs of economic and viewership contraction. But there seem to be as many different contradictory desires for "changes" floating around as there are on a forum like this. More night races? Seriously? What night? The sport runs on TV money, and Saturday night races are a ratings disaster as compared to Sunday afternoon. Maybe they should try mid-week, but that is a real shot in the dark.

Many believe the sport is being dominated too much by a few teams and drivers. Maybe that is true on some level, but solving it requires a different long term approach, not "we must change faster!". More to the point, the drivers who are currently dominating don't create compelling narrative for casual fans to latch onto. But again, that isn't something you fix quickly.
So was it ok back in the day when Petty dominated, when Elliot did with his T-bird? It's part of the sport, that's what makes it interesting, watching a team and driver hit on something that works. Making the cars more equal won't be a good thing.
 
So was it ok back in the day when Petty dominated, when Elliot did with his T-bird? It's part of the sport, that's what makes it interesting, watching a team and driver hit on something that works. Making the cars more equal won't be a good thing.

I agree as a racing fan, though even back then NASCAR certainly did what they could to level the playing field regarding Elliot's T-bird and other 'too dominant cars.

But a TV executive would look at NASCAR's much hyped popularity woes and say "You have to get Chase Elliott and Ryan Blaney and maybe Bubba Wallace up there fighting and winning races. We need popular characters we can sell." That would probably help, but what the hell is NASCAR supposed to do, script that? No thanks. Hopefully some of the popular faces will come around, and the media will pounce when they do.
 
Last edited:
Murstein's idiocy aside (easy to see why RPM is what it is), the general consensus does not seem to be good, and a lot more changes may be on the way.

I do wonder why more tracks are not open midweek races. With the majority of revenue coming from TV you'd think they'd be willing to take a chance somewhere. But, that is part of the problem - too many different stakeholders. No doubt TV would want to ship a terribly-performing Saturday night (a generally awful night for TV) to say, Wednesday night.
 
These two guys scare me with comments like

"The same people basically win every week, it gets boring"
"There needs to be similar equipment for everyone"
"There needs to be more night races"

I thought B France was out of touch with reality, but I am thinking not as much as these guys.
That frightens me as well.
 
I have a couple of complaints with night racing, but I don't know that anything about the racing itself is inherently more or less entertaining than a day race under otherwise similar conditions.

Good luck selling fans on reincarnating Cup as the second coming of IROC, or the tracks on weeknights. NASCAR might get track buy-in if they tried the same thing IndyCar does in ... Detroit? I think that's it. They run two races on consecutive days. Maybe back-to-back 250 or 300-milers on Wednesday and Thursday would work. Finishing order of the first race is starting order of the second, but otherwise they're two separate races, each with the usual points awarded.
I think a lot of the time it's the idea that track conditions differ typically a lot from day to night. Over the last few years I think the spring Richmond race was better than the fall Richmond race. But this spring's race was good, so...

But it didn't sound like they were talking Saturday night races, because that's a TV non-starter. Midweek races near big city areas, like you described.
 
These two guys scare me with comments like

"The same people basically win every week, it gets boring"
"There needs to be similar equipment for everyone"
"There needs to be more night races"

I thought B France was out of touch with reality, but I am thinking not as much as these guys.
It sounds like if these fellas have their way, we are going to have an IROC series that races during Weds or Thurs night. Not sure If I'll be a fan of that.
 
I would be up for a mid week race though during the summer, the day after the MLB All Star game would be perfect. Not sure where you would have it but since my home track of Chicagoland is struggling for attendance it seems, likes volunteer them.
 
"You have to get Chase Elliott and Ryan Blaney and maybe Bubba Wallace up there fighting and winning races. We need popular characters we can sell."
There weren't any problems selling Jr. or Danica, and they weren't causing the record books to be rewritten every season. If selling drivers is necessary, how about sell the ones that are already winning? It seems to work with Tom Brady and LeBron James.
 
There weren't any problems selling Jr. or Danica, and they weren't causing the record books to be rewritten every season. If selling drivers is necessary, how about sell the ones that are already winning? It seems to work with Tom Brady and LeBron James.

Great drivers sell themselves by winning.

With so much attention being made to Jr and Danica, lets get some of the young guys out there with those who are not familiar with paying attention to the feeder series.
 
Midweek races near big city areas, like you described.
Thought about this a while ago. Most stick and ball sports have their venues in or near big populated cities.

How many NASCAR tracks are virtually in BFE? Too many people look at a map and dismiss traveling hours away for half a day event and then drive back.
 
There weren't any problems selling Jr. or Danica, and they weren't causing the record books to be rewritten every season. If selling drivers is necessary, how about sell the ones that are already winning? It seems to work with Tom Brady and LeBron James.
It really is crazy to me that JJ a living legend who is a 7 time Champion that is still racing and maybe not contending right, but races every week isnt more popular. I dont think I'll ever figure out why that is.
 
It really is crazy to me that JJ a living legend who is a 7 time Champion that is still racing and maybe not contending right, but races every week isnt more popular. I dont think I'll ever figure out why that is.
Cuz him winning 5 championships in a row with no direct rival is one contributing factor to people turning the TV off.
 
Cuz him winning 5 championships in a row with no direct rival is one contributing factor to people turning the TV off.
He wasn't winning every week; he wasn't even winning half. Despite what everyone says about Harvick this year, he isn't winning half the races either.
 
Back
Top Bottom