Every thread on Kyle Busch seems to have at least a few people mention how Kyle has the most "raw talent" of any driver...
How exactly do people come to this conclusion?
He mashes the gas, and literally every other input is in the hands of the crew and Goodyear. So if you get in his way, he's pissed. If you can mash the gas harder, he's pissed. Put him in a late 60s Plymouth, or put him in a mid 80s race at talladega, and he wouldn't be raw, likely his corpse would be charred, I doubt he'll ever be able to handle an Indy car. None of these sniveling brats would have survived this sport 30 years ago.
Oh goody. One more thread dedicated to discounting the talent of Kyle Busch. For the love of all that's holy, we get it.
I quantify raw talent as if I could put said driver in another form of Motorsport how would he do? A IMSA car, Indy Car, F1 car, NHRA or dirt car? I'd put both Busch brothers, Larson, Elliott, Jones in an Indy Car right now. I'd love to see how Kyle Busch could do in an F1 car, that'd be fun.
Elliott is young enough to learn and he's got the car control. He wouldn't win right away but I bet you he'd be a top 15 in pointsElliott? No way. Jones maybe, but would need way more time to adjust. Kyle would make me nervous driving an Indycar but I think he could do it.
There are people in the HOF that only ran lower series.It isn't measured by winning in lower-tier series.
He mashes the gas, and literally every other input is in the hands of the crew and Goodyear. So if you get in his way, he's pissed. If you can mash the gas harder, he's pissed. Put him in a late 60s Plymouth, or put him in a mid 80s race at talladega, and he wouldn't be raw, likely his corpse would be charred, I doubt he'll ever be able to handle an Indy car. None of these sniveling brats would have survived this sport 30 years ago.
Oh goody. One more thread dedicated to discounting the talent of Kyle Busch. For the love of all that's holy, we get it.
Raw talent in their universe means when a driver crashes out anybody in their way.Not discounting anything, I'm genuinely curious.
People are always on about how kyle Busch has the most raw talent in NASCAR, but I don't understand how people come to that conclusion. I never see or hear anybody rattle on about anybody else's "raw talent" when they win, so just wondering.
Raw talent in their universe means when a driver crashes out anybody in their way.
I don't attack your opinions so I would appreciate it if you wouldn't attack mine. I respect your right to have an opinion and expect the same in return. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.Statements like "crashing cars out of the way" is what I was alluding to in my previous post as I didn't see Kyle crash out anyone last night last night or the race before or the race before or the race before and so on and so on.
It is in the eye of the beholder.Every thread on Kyle Busch seems to have at least a few people mention how Kyle has the most "raw talent" of any driver...
How exactly do people come to this conclusion?
I don't attack your opinions so I would appreciate it if you wouldn't attack mine. I respect your right to have an opinion and expect the same in return. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Although I disagree, this is an opinion and you are entitled to it.No question that you are entitled to your own opinions. I understand that people don't like Kyle and I understand why but I don't see him as an on track menace routinely crashing out cars in the cup series.
I watched all races and when did he crash people? Maybe I missed something can u please tell us.I don't attack your opinions so I would appreciate it if you wouldn't attack mine. I respect your right to have an opinion and expect the same in return. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Since you asked a reasonable question I'll answer it. I've formed my opinion of him from the day he first came into the sport. There are scads of YouTube videos showing wreck after wreck that he purposely initiated. Look them up.I watched all races and when did he crash people? Maybe I missed something can u please tell us.
Ok I'll check it out.Since you asked a reasonable question I'll answer it. I've formed my opinion of him from the day he first came into the sport. There are scads of YouTube videos showing wreck after wreck that he purposely initiated. Look them up.
I watched all races and when did he crash people? Maybe I missed something can u please tell us.
Ok I'll check it out.
Every thread on Kyle Busch seems to have at least a few people mention how Kyle has the most "raw talent" of any driver...
How exactly do people come to this conclusion?
Raw talent is used to deflect from unfullfilled expectations.
Someone that believes Kyle Busch is the best driver, needs the raw talent plank.
Because while his accomplishments are great, first ballot Hall of Fame material etc, it does not work as well if one believes he is the GOAT.
Jimmie Johnsons are significantly better accross the board. So the "raw talent" and other Olympic Scorecard type of points have to be made. He simply doesn't measure up in terms of actual accomplishments, and if that "raw talent" ever hits peak form he better get on the championship roll soon if he ever wants to catch JJ.
Add in winning more too.
Johnsons win ratio is about a 5 to 3, when compard to Kyle.
Kyle aint getting any younger, and that raw talent needs to deliver more, to get wide spread GOAT consideration.
Ok I'll check it out.
He still takes a back seat to Jimmie on talent.
Jimmie drives the loosest cars and has stolen so many races with 5th place cars on driving, and will alone. 2007 Atlanta vs Tony Stewart comes to mind.
Cars aside, 2004-2013 Jimmie was visibly a better driver than anyone on the track, including KB.
KB may be 2nd, but when it comes to "driving a cup car" Jimmie Johnson, and Tony Stewart were both better
Would love to see Kyle jump in a sprint car with Larson & Stewart.Wins, no matter what he drives he tends to win.