An entertaining race for sure, but I can't call it a good Indy 500. And it's not the kind of story Indycar would want, in order to capitalize on the 350,000 crowd to create momentum for the struggling series, IMO. The visceral appeal of Indy comes from the people who live and breathe the 500, 365 days per year. Foyt. Andretti. Al and Bobby Unser. Mears. The Captain. Helio and TK. Chip Ganassi and Sam Schmidt and others.
Instead, we have a rookie who wants to be somewhere else, in a seat he purchased, winning on a fuel mileage deal. He had enough speed to be about 10th place, but only because so many had trouble. I give him and Bryan Herta all the credit in the world for pulling it off, and Rossi had to drive the car, keep his nose clean, and nurse it home. It's a good story, just not a good story for the 100th Indy 500. Just my opinion.
The race strongly reminded me of Daytona, except slightly narrower and easier to slingshot. Mash the pedal to the floor, keep it there, and work the air. The air will give you a run on the car ahead, so you pass. Then he gets the draft, he gets the run, so he passes you back. Rinse and repeat. It's not easy (nor is Daytona), but it's not real automobile racing IMO. It is aero-dominant racing, and that is a different deal.
I'd love to see Indycar slash downforce by 2 tons and boost horsepower a little. Rather than cornering at 220 mph, target maybe 175 or 180. Use brakes and off throttle time. Give it back to the drivers, so the modern versions of Foyt and Andretti could rise to the task. Ahhh, wishful thinking.