Y'all complaining about the track. The track is what it is, everyone is in the same boat. I would like to know if there was a difference between track prep that is normally used a Knoxville and what NASCAR does.
Have not received validation yet, but will probably get it as it channels through various teams and vendors. But, one of my engine builders in Iowa (Sprint car engines mostly) said NASCAR did not allow chemical treatment. If that is true, you are running on a virgin dirt track....NOT CLAY, so as the top dries, it is just loose dirt. That is like racing in a farm field. The reason the bottom retained a smidgen of grip was due to the leeching affect of the 8% bank....the treatment probably runs a few feet down into the soil.
But that is not all. These cars are not really dirt race friendly. The USAC Stock Car boys learned that forty years ago. Truck arm rear suspensions suck on the dirt. Cheap leaf springs are tons better. Most of those girls and a few men last night were relying on their tires for 90% of their forward bite, the closer you get to relying on the suspension for 50% of that bite, the faster you will go.
Only a few drivers actually realized that last night, Kraus was one of them, he feathered the peddle a lot more than most. Would like to see Windom more too...he was getting better and better. Same thing with Brown.