dpkimmel2001
Team Owner
I think I know the answer already but maybe I'll be surprised with the answers.....
3 out of 10 racing-forum.com members agree.Must've been pretty good, I watched every weekend.
No point in wasting time on something you don't like, right?
I agree...... and now that Alex Bowman has landed the 88 ride is going to make the 2018 season even more exciting for me.GO ABGood season. A lot of top notch young talent coming into the sport, Larson and Elliott could really take off next season
I like stage racing and the playoffs, but seeing one car that was far and away superior than everyone else every week was extremely boring. It's a huge accomplishment for the 78 team to have been as great as they were, probably the most dominant season-long performance since Gordon in 1998. But for me, it was boring as hell and took away from a lot of the positives of the year.
Hopefully the other manufacturers and teams step up their game.
I think there are 2 ways to look at it as on one hand dominating performances can be see as being dull and predictable or you can sit back and appreciate what is involved by becoming that good that often. Whether it is in racing or sports I think it can take a period of many years before outstanding accomplishments are appreciated.
Maybe the days of following Chad are done and the current CC's need to reinvent their ideas.I like stage racing and the playoffs, but seeing one car that was far and away superior than everyone else every week was extremely boring. It's a huge accomplishment for the 78 team to have been as great as they were, probably the most dominant season-long performance since Gordon in 1998. But for me, it was boring as hell and took away from a lot of the positives of the year.
Hopefully the other manufacturers and teams step up their game.
very fast road course with many high speed corners..favors a car with high D/FIf he won every single race, or led every single lap in one race, that's a performance so dominant, you have to appreciate it. If he goes and wins six straight championships, same deal.
The other hard part about it is, Truex's domination was limited to the mile-and-a-half tracks. Watkins Glen was the only race he won that wasn't at a mile-and-a-half track and it was a fuel mileage win.
48 won his championships because the chase were predominantly mile and half. It will be that way until Nascar makes real changes.If he won every single race, or led every single lap in one race, that's a performance so dominant, you have to appreciate it. If he goes and wins six straight championships, same deal.
The other hard part about it is, Truex's domination was limited to the mile-and-a-half tracks. Watkins Glen was the only race he won that wasn't at a mile-and-a-half track and it was a fuel mileage win.
48 won his championships because the chase were predominantly mile and half. It will be that way until Nascar makes real changes.
Looks like that is all you need these days.
It was decent. Not extraordinary, not terrible. It seemed to start out strong and then got less interesting as the season went on. I think that's a combination of viewer fatigue, scheduling, and TRD dominance.
7 on a 10 scale.
Martinsville fall race, best of the year.
I don't mind seeing a car that is dominant and far superior ......... that just shows they did their homework and everyone else is sucking hind teat ...... they others... as you said... need to get off their laurels and step it up...... I see nothing wrong with that..... What made me think this was a great year is that...... Even though Nascar was intent on throwing a stupid lottery for the last race to crown a Champion...... the best team..... the most consistent throughout the year won....... as it should be..... consistency........ not dog-assed luck in the last race...... and..... not luck getting into the last races..... even though Truex was far and above the caliber of the rest of the field for the entire year.... he could have been locked out of being even considered for the Cup had he faltered in any of the ''Chase races''...... You may be just slobbering happy with Brian and his ''wonderful ideas that are going to make Nascar great again''........ (Nascar was great before Brian took over)...... I for one have never liked the Chase.... Playoffs...... or whatever you want to term it...... the system was just fine before 2003....... maybe a small bit of tweaking to add more points for wins...... that was it..... graduated scale that Latford had........ there was not a thing wrong with it........ It was fair.......I like stage racing and the playoffs, but seeing one car that was far and away superior than everyone else every week was extremely boring. It's a huge accomplishment for the 78 team to have been as great as they were, probably the most dominant season-long performance since Gordon in 1998. But for me, it was boring as hell and took away from a lot of the positives of the year.
Hopefully the other manufacturers and teams step up their game.
Hmm...you must watch different racing than the rest of us.To me, 2017 was an outstanding year of racing, even better than 2016 which was also outstanding. The substantial reduction of downforce was a key ingredient, adding to the degree of difficulty and reducing (but not eliminating) the aero benefit of clean air. There were still several races that were real stinkers, mostly due to single-groove tracks such as Charlotte and repaved Kentucky.
Also, the points system was much better than 2014-16, and this was an important improvement to me. I also thought stage racing worked very well, better than I expected. The biggest negative to me was the sizable speed advantage held by the Toyotas. I'm hoping for a more level playing field in 2018.