- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 38,250
- Points
- 1,033
What would NASCAR do with 4 charters?
Other than spending $10 or 20 Million or so to prove a conflict of interest?
Other than spending $10 or 20 Million or so to prove a conflict of interest?
Great question but that's been a point of contention since the beginning of negotiations two years ago.What would NASCAR do with 4 charters?
Other than spending $10 or 20 Million or so to prove a conflict of interest?
Other thing I find interesting is that they say 32 charters. One would have to wonder how long SHR is going to sit around on these charters before someone else gets a good deal on them?
These guys might have shot themselves in the foot by saying they plan on competing next year even if they have to do it as an open car
Nascar blocked SHR's sale of their charters. I wonder if Nascar bought them back, or if SHR still has them?
That's pretty impossible now that Nascar announced that there is only a 32 charter field now. Haas has signed the agreement or they wouldn't have charters also. Nascar has to approve the sale and use of the charters. 23XI and Front Row aren't going to be getting full share prize money unless they can get their charters back.In theory, Haas could just field Front Row cars under his charters.
If NASCAR's going to increase the winnings for the chartered teams since there are only 32 charters now, nothing is stopping the teams from donating that money to 23XI and Front Row for their lawsuit against NASCAR either.
If the field size remains at 40, they'll be fine. There will eight open slots instead of four. Few races had full 40-car fields.These guys might have shot themselves in the foot by saying they plan on competing next year even if they have to do it as an open car
Or lease the charters for the season. Although now that I've typed that, I suspect leasing a charter requires signing the sacred contract.In theory, Haas could just field Front Row cars under his charters.
nothing is stopping the teams from donating that money to 23XI and Front Row for their lawsuit against NASCAR either.
That is a big "if" with the field size remaining at 40 when the charters are reduced to 32If the field size remains at 40, they'll be fine. There will eight open slots instead of four. Few races had full 40-car fields.
Go fund me??
There are people still frosted over reducing the field from 43 to 40, and over the charters having the effect of often resulting in a 36-car field. 32 will really torque their Underoos. Heck, IndyCar routinely starts 27. The Rolex will be pushing 60 and IMSA is worried about having enough pit spaces.That is a big "if" with the field size remaining at 40 when the charters are reduced to 32
Some people look for every little excuse to frost themselves in Nascar world. There should be some juicy deathbedding now that Nascar is going broke and only offering 32 charters.There are people still frosted over reducing the field form 43 to 40, and over the charters having the effect of often resulting in a 36-car field. 32 will really torque their Underoos. Heck, IndyCar routinely starts 27. The Rolex will be pushing 60 and IMSA is worried about having enough pit spaces.
That's pretty impossible now that Nascar announced that there is only a 32 charter field now. Haas has signed the agreement or they wouldn't have charters also. Nascar has to approve the sale and use of the charters. 23XI and Front Row aren't going to be getting full share prize money unless they can get their charters back.
You're killing me, man!
I tend to believe it's both.Are you deliberately being obtuse or can you just not help it?
Dude, I wouldn't want to get into a who is the craziest contest with ya.I tend to believe it's both.
Tell ya what sparky, you can go on down the road with that and see how far it gets ya. You seem to hear what you want to hear. Myself, I see all of the teams have signed on the dotted line except 2. Nobody held a gun to their head. Those that signed have seven years to find another path for their lives if they don't like it.The other teams are outright saying they signed the charter agreement because they had a gun held to their head.
It's absolutely on the table that they take additional revenue they get and donate it to legal fees. 23XI is probably going to win this lawsuit.
And they signed the agreement to get the money, not to turn it over to someone else. I don't see them dropping an anchor on 23FR but I don't see them tossing a life saver either.The other teams are outright saying they signed the charter agreement because they had a gun held to their head.
It's absolutely on the table that they take additional revenue they get and donate it to legal fees. 23XI is probably going to win this lawsuit.
But it makes the financial hardship argument impossible considering they say they'd compete for less than what was offeredThey kind of had to say something, they have sponsor commitments that have to be honored.
LMAO! Well played my man. Well played!Dude, I wouldn't want to get into a who is the craziest contest with ya.
Some keep forgetting, or just don't believe, the original idea of charters was so an owner had something of value if they decided to walk away. Old race cars aren't worth much. Tooling wears out. Parts become obsolete. I suppose maybe we need to define a race team? What exactly do you have if the owner comes in on a Monday, calls shop meeting, we done. Today. You have until 5PM to remove your stuff.I still think at some point the ROI on buying a charter isn't worth it. But without seeing the pay outs we'd never know.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
They said the same thing about horse racing.I'll be little surprised if NASCAR is still a thing 10 years from now. Definitely won't be using combustion engines. Boomers are dying off. NASCAR is mainly a boomer thing. Once they gone, good 50% of the audience is gone.
I'm 65. Maybe it's because of the places I lived as a military brat but I don't remember horse racing as being widely popular in my lifetime. Is it now?They said the same thing about horse racing.
Oooooh, more crumbs.
Show me where NASCAR stated specifically that charters were designed to provide owners with a tangible asset of value when they were introduced? Haven’t seen it and I doubt you will find it. The intent of charters was to guarantee a team’s participation in every race, with set funding they could count on, AND thereby enable them to guarantee sponsors availability over a guaranteed number of races. Nothing more. As this was a valuable part of participating in the sport, teams wanting to enter sought to aquire the rights from existing teams, leading to a market for those rights. The ownership of the participation slot was always kept by NASCAR. If a new team wanted to “buy” a charter, they were actually paying for a subleasing agreement, not a tangible asset with deed or title. NASCAR was still the arbiter of approval for a transfer of charter rights.Some keep forgetting, or just don't believe, the original idea of charters was so an owner had something of value if they decided to walk away. Old race cars aren't worth much. Tooling wears out. Parts become obsolete. I suppose maybe we need to define a race team? What exactly do you have if the owner comes in on a Monday, calls shop meeting, we done. Today. You have until 5PM to remove your stuff.
Ok? Now what is the "business" worth? Charter is worth XXXXXXX. So that's something. Used to be next to nothing. Auction time. Pennies on the dollar. What all those X's total up to is/will change. Maybe NASCAR's goal IS to make them fairly worthless. Only value being a guaranteed start. Be quite some time before this all shakes out.
I'll be little surprised if NASCAR is still a thing 10 years from now. Definitely won't be using combustion engines. Boomers are dying off. NASCAR is mainly a boomer thing. Once they gone, good 50% of the audience is gone.
How happy will those teams be if NASCAR loses this fight? It will have to revert to splitting the money 36 ways instead of 32.NASCAR with a power move here and at the same time feeding the teams that signed happy by relocating money that would otherwise be for the teams that didn't sign the charter contract.
All of that could have been done with other methods without requiring the introduction of charters. For example, guaranteeing those things to the teams that averaged in the top 36 in points over the previous three years.The intent of charters was to guarantee a team’s participation in every race, with set funding they could count on, AND thereby enable them to guarantee sponsors availability over a guaranteed number of races.