wi_racefan
Team Owner
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2017
- Messages
- 6,662
- Points
- 773
Wow I mean seriously?
23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement
- Thread starter Blaze
- Start date
Wow I mean seriously?
Of course. NASCAR is free. It’s on the internet so it must be true.
Looking forward to the close of this lawsuit.
Earlier Probst started to talk about the split in Indy and Bell silenced him.
More Bell.
The Gen 7 is a piece of crap. Hopefully more spending will result in a better on-track product.
The car is so awesome that there are a multitude of changes next year, depending on the track, in an effort to improve the racing product.
Perhaps they should have consulted the teams and drivers that race these things.
Perhaps they should have consulted the teams and drivers that race these things.
Here is Bell being a legal bench idiot. It’s judgements like that which give me pause as to his fairness (and suspicion of bias). What NASCAR wants to introduce is vital, goes to their claim of consequences relative to decisions AND their rationale for validating the current system, which helped the entire ecosystem achieve the current TV rights package.
Bell says they can take it up on appeal. He knows his FIX is in and he’s fully prepared for being usurped again like a cheap suit by the higher court. This guy needs to retire.
This is a pretty good summation of the testimony of John Probst, senior vice president of innovation and racing development for NASCAR.
One of the female lawyers was wearing a walking cast. Bell said to her is that a Jordan?
Nah that doesn't matter that a media group exec was going to testify about a clause in their contract that if teams leave the series, their contract is nul and void. We don't need to hear that right? That would be no reason to lock in the teams in the series.
I don't know enough about the law to know if this is grounds for a mistrial, but it sure looks like grounds for an appeal.
