FLRacingFan
Team Owner
October C-USA needs a catchy tag like November MACtion now.
Seriously it’s good that they won’t have games on Stadium and Facebook anymore.
Seriously it’s good that they won’t have games on Stadium and Facebook anymore.
Not sure why anyone would complain about more meaningful college football games. I can not wait for this 12 team playoffNow imagine this happening after everything we just watched.
No thank you, please don't do this college football, it's not too late to change your mind, hit us up here at rf for more tips and suggestions.
The argument is that it really takes away a lot of the meaning from regular season games and shifts it elsewhere. For a sport that’s prided itself on having the best regular season in sports that’s a significant change. The Alabama games against Tennessee and LSU don’t have the same impact if 10-2 squads can comfortably make it. Same thing with Ohio State/Michigan, where in 2006/2016/2021/2022 it decided (or will decide) who makes the CFP or BCSNCG. It doesn’t have the same impact if the loser gets to host a playoff game instead of go-or-go-home.Not sure why anyone would complain about more meaningful college football games. I can not wait for this 12 team playoff
The argument is that it really takes away a lot of the meaning from regular season games and shifts it elsewhere. For a sport that’s prided itself on having the best regular season in sports that’s a significant change. The Alabama games against Tennessee and LSU don’t have the same impact if 10-2 squads can comfortably make it. Same thing with Ohio State/Michigan, where in 2006/2016/2021/2022 it decided (or will decide) who makes the CFP or BCSNCG. It doesn’t have the same impact if the loser gets to host a playoff game instead of go-or-go-home.
On the flip side it makes fringe top 10-20 games mean more at this point in the season. This week’s Penn State/Maryland game would mean more in the future than it does now. So the question is really whether or not decreasing the meaning of the season’s biggest games in exchange for heightening that of the 10-25 is worth it.
The argument is that it really takes away a lot of the meaning from regular season games and shifts it elsewhere. For a sport that’s prided itself on having the best regular season in sports that’s a significant change. The Alabama games against Tennessee and LSU don’t have the same impact if 10-2 squads can comfortably make it. Same thing with Ohio State/Michigan, where in 2006/2016/2021/2022 it decided (or will decide) who makes the CFP or BCSNCG. It doesn’t have the same impact if the loser gets to host a playoff game instead of go-or-go-home.
On the flip side it makes fringe top 10-20 games mean more at this point in the season. This week’s Penn State/Maryland game would mean more in the future than it does now. So the question is really whether or not decreasing the meaning of the season’s biggest games in exchange for heightening that of the 10-25 is worth it.
Conference titles, rivalries, bowl games. That’s what it’s all about. Everyone got tunnel vision and thinks they can win the natty now. The narrow scope seems to feed itself because then schools jump leagues so they can make bazillions more or else they don’t think they can compete. Is it going to get better when the SEC gets five CFP teams and takes home the majority of the TV money?Yep. Also, it's all about the money. More playoff games = more $$$
And outside of the playoff, nobody seems to give a damn about bowl games anymore. The good players usually sit out to "focus on preparing for the NFL draft" because the Alamo Bowl or the Poinsettia Bowl or the Humanitarian Bowl or whatever means absolutely nothing to anyone nowadays.
I miss the days when every regular season game mattered, and bowl season was something to look forward to.
Conference titles, rivalries, bowl games. That’s what it’s all about. Everyone got tunnel vision and thinks they can win the natty now. The narrow scope seems to feed itself because then schools jump leagues so they can make bazillions more or else they don’t think they can compete. Is it going to get better when the SEC gets five CFP teams and takes home the majority of the TV money?
I **** you not, I read an AP article this week about rising travel and food costs “straining” college athletics budgets and a couple of the schools covered were Iowa and Nebraska. The Big Ten is already the richest conference and will be clearing nine figures per school annually before long. Nebraska couldn’t wait three weeks to save $7.5M on Scott Frost’s buyout. It was probably the most tone deaf thing I’ve read in a while.The identity of college football is getting destroyed. Regional conferences are a thing of the past, and that's sad. Now it's all about TV money and capturing markets so the rich guys running these athletic programs and superconferences can get even richer. It's nauseating.
If you're Texas or Oklahoma, would you rather be a top dog in the Big 12, or a 7-win team in the SEC? The answer is obvious, because they already made their choice. They chose the money.
The identity of college football is getting destroyed. Regional conferences are a thing of the past, and that's sad. Now it's all about TV money and capturing markets so the rich guys running these athletic programs and superconferences can get even richer. It's nauseating.
If you're Texas or Oklahoma, would you rather be a top dog in the Big 12, or a 7-win team in the SEC? The answer is obvious, because they already made their choice. They chose the money.
Vanderbilt just beat Kentucky. Do I need to talk more about how the SEC benefits from inflated preseason rankings?
They absolutely have to go to 9 conference games when OU and Texas join. Hell, the Big Ten is considering going to 10 game when USC/UCLA arrive.8 conference games. Late season FCS home game. 2 other mediocre Sun Belt + MAC schools. Profit.
Tennessee up by 35 with a minute left at the goal line and still trying to score, what a lovable team