Personally, I think the dumb part was to blatantly tell him not to pass... that’s where it becomes a slap in the face. Could have had code words to let them know to overdrive the tires and have to pit, taking them out of the equation. Hell, slam the clutch and say something broke... ANYTHING to hide the fact that they were hand picking the running order of their cars to help one at the expense of the others... that is altering the finish order. Period.
I don’t think they can do much in this scenario except take Hamlin out of the Championship 4 and put Harvick in... but then NASCAR is altering the finish and they don’t want to do that either, no matter how many conspiracy theories exist.
I would love, though, to see NASCAR use this as a clear example of where the line is on the rule and start suspending charters for teams who soil the nature of racing and try to manipulate the outcome beyond letting the race speak for itself in the final laps. For example in this situation, Joe Gibbs would only be allowed to run 3 cars next year.
That way, the teams will get hit harder than any fine when they are down one car for a year, losing sponsor dollars, losing the interest of potential new sponsors and possible factory deals, losing the interest and ability to hire young drivers into their program at that level.
It also might possibly give a lower tiered team access to a top tier driver or equipment like all of these “Satelite Teams” and partners we’re seeing now, even if it’s only on a year lease, because that would be the only way to keep a driver under contract to the penalized team... you get to keep your driver on the track with your equipment... but JD What’s-his-butt Race Team has to manage it and gets to keep all the race winnings from it.
If Gibbs, Stewart, Penske or Hendrick had to go one season with one less car in their pocket, the effects would be felt a whole lot more than a money fine.