Mick tested the rain guards and they didn’t work as intended so it’s back to the drawing board.
At certain places the trees are so close straights are more like a topless tunnel. The trees form a wind barrier that won't let the air current carry away the mist. Making things worse, ground effects cars tend to "atomize" the water molecules and makes the mist worse, and makes it hang longer.
You all saw what Spa looked like. Goggle up the old videos of the Pironi accident at the old Hockenheim, another place lined with trees. If you look at how they raced in a monsoon in Brazil a few years ago, there was none of the mist hampering vision so much because that's a relatively open place.
The ground effects cars are making a bad problem worse. All the water coming from under the car is turned into mist. Another problem Max brought up was the tires are bigger on these cars and displace more water.
They changed the rules for points allocations after that Spa ‘21 debacle. They won’t award any points unless at least two laps are run under green,
Imagine paying $1500 for a good seat at Vegas and being sent home after four laps. That would kill a country's GP in one fell swoop. The six car race they had at Indianapolis burned the fans so bad attendance the next year was pitiful, with plenty of local coverage reminding everyone who got screwed, complete with picketing. Yeah, sign me up for that! At the end of the contract Indianapolis was dropped like a brick, and hasn't been back or even in the discussion. You can't hose the fans like that. In the end, Tony Goerge gave everyone a ticket to the next race, but people were still angry then and still angry now.
So, when you add Indianapolis 2005, and Spa 21 to that, F1 simply can't get away with hosing the fans again. I read somewhere the hot seats in Vegas are going for $15,000. Imagine kissing off that kind of money to see four laps behind the safetycar. Imagine a race so compelling that Nikita Mazepin gets the fastest lap.
and there are varying allocations depending on whether the race fails to reach 25%, 50%, and 75% of the race distance completed.
It used to be 3/4 distance or half points.
I think at this moment it’s more likely to rain during the Sprint so I’m wondering if that’s something that could be cancelled entirely should the weather be bad enough.
From a safety standpoint absolutely, but imagine if they end up like they did in Spa '21. I don't believe people got thier money back on that one, so to do it again two years later earn a death star rating.
From a sporting standpoint, I'm all for cancelling a race if it gets too dangerous. From a business standpoint though, that's a tough decision to make. FIA can't keep pissing people off like this or they are just going to have to not race in the rain.