I pretty much share your opinions of both of them personally. However, as much as I don't like him, I consider Harvick to be rather intelligent and perceptive, and his points here are valid. If he's ripping on anything, it's the pedestal that Dale Jr. is forever placed on that isn't based on performance. I agree with him that Jimmie Johnson should be regarded as a legend and at a higher level than any driver during the past two decades, and that his unparalleled accomplishments should be driving interest. Yes, comparisons to other sports are imperfect, but he should be the Tom Brady / Lebron James / Tiger Woods (pre-scandal) / Lance Armstrong (pre-scandal) of his sport. That Johnson's feats don't have the same impact as the mere presence of other more popular "personalities" says something odd about NASCAR and what drives it. That for a huge chunk of the fanbase it's more about culture than competition. Even with regard to racing, I'm trying to think of a situation in another racing series where there has been a competitor as dominant as Jimmie Johnson, and yet he or she is not nearly as popular as several less accomplished peers. I'm sure there is one, and if so I'm eager to discuss the parallels.