NASCAR Apologist
Random login issues
Knaus says parts arriving out of spec isn’t particular to Chevy teams, yet only five cars from one manufacturer have rocked up to a race with modified parts this season. Hmm.
This is why. I post these posts where Wright says himself they loaned Hendrick louvers.
Post #150
illegally modified*Knaus says parts arriving out of spec isn’t particular to Chevy teams, yet only five cars from one manufacturer have rocked up to a race with modified parts this season. Hmm.
Hendrick’s appeal likely will come down to two factors:
--NASCAR says it has had discussions with the teams on slight modifications they could do to the louvers to make them fit as the supplier has had issues making them 100 percent to NASCAR specifications. NASCAR contends that Hendrick went well beyond any approved modifications (sources say they modified the edges); Knaus indicated they had
Damn, and here I was hoping to be one of them. Gotta try harder.There are 2 people here that I never take anything they say very serious. Rev and Andy.
Maybe it's just me but by dragging their feet it seems like nascar is worried about this one holding up.The fact that nascar said go ahead and modify them to fit but dont go too far, to me means they should win on appeal
How do you know they are having 4 separate appeal hearings?WTF is with NASCAR, The ideas are coming out of left field. Why are the wanting HMS to have 4 different appeal hearings for the same thing. Makes no sence
So they can let #9 off while upholding the penalties for the weak sisters. Chase will need the owner's points.How do you know they are having 4 separate appeal hearings?
That's all they talked about today on Sirius. Nascar is doing this. they will have a separate hearing and appeals panel for each car # . That's the delay. It's stupid.How do you know they are having 4 separate appeal hearings?
Yeah because somehow the case would be different for one of the 1 HMS cars. Seems like a stall tactic to meThat's all they talked about today on Sirius. Nascar is doing this. they will have a separate hearing and appeals panel for each car # . That's the delay. It's stupid.
I can help. DM me.Damn, and here I was hoping to be one of them. Gotta try harder.
See, the problem is that you are operating on the assumption that Chadly is being truthful....Jeffy too....and well the Ex Con....ya know.Listening to Chad K today it sounds like Hendrick runs its business a lot better then NASCAR. More or less someone gave them the ok to fit them because they did not match the CAD drawing, Chad also made it sound like this is a common occurrence lately. Is someone at NASCAR not doing their job and checking to make sure single manufacturer parts are being made correctly ? Also they put the cars into an unnecessary prepactrice inspection. That they passed. Before qualifying they took the parts. They took 2 off each HMS car and only 1 from the 31
If anybody thinks this penalty will stick, they are out of their minds. This will be the classic "against all odds" and "truth wins" narrative. We will be faced with listening to Jeffy chest pumping how nobody calls into question Ex Con Motorsports' integrity.Yeah because somehow the case would be different for one of the 1 HMS cars. Seems like a stall tactic to me
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
So glad you have turned it around and are rooting for the Hendrick Kaulig bunch. What a feel good story for an X convict to turn his life around and make good in Nascar.If anybody thinks this penalty will stick, they are out of their minds. This will be the classic "against all odds" and "truth wins" narrative. We will be faced with listening to Jeffy chest pumping how nobody calls into question Ex Con Motorsports' integrity.
I'll be glad to be wrong (as it's frustrating as hell to see Larson with the fastest car this year back in 30th in points), but I think this penalty stands.If anybody thinks this penalty will stick, they are out of their minds. This will be the classic "against all odds" and "truth wins" narrative. We will be faced with listening to Jeffy chest pumping how nobody calls into question Ex Con Motorsports' integrity.
If Hendrick doesn't think they have a case, why would they appeal?If Hendrick thinks they have a case, why proceed with the crew chief suspensions, instead of delaying them until after the appeal?
Because they are entitled. I think Jeffy and Chadly are genuinely shocked. Interesting that we haven't heard from the Ex Con.If Hendrick doesn't think they have a case, why would they appeal?
I think likely NASCAR came with the big ball penalty anticipating that it would be reduced. Anticipate 25 pts. per car, and a few of the Ex Con's hundreds.I'll be glad to be wrong (as it's frustrating as hell to see Larson with the fastest car this year back in 30th in points), but I think this penalty stands.
I'd be shocked if it gets overturned.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I think he's learned his lesson. No more bribing the yota people with a REAL carI think likely NASCAR came with the big ball penalty anticipating that it would be reduced. Anticipate 25 pts. per car, and a few of the Ex Con's hundreds.
They are appealing with the hope of lowering it to a 2 race suspension, they know the penalty won't be fully removed. Didn't we go over this last week?If Hendrick thinks they have a case, why proceed with the crew chief suspensions, instead of delaying them until after the appeal?
If they have a paper trail of Nascar saying go ahead and modify the parts to fit, then there should be no penalties
That depends on the tolerances built into the specific parts. All manufactured parts have a tolerance. No parts are exactly the same. In this case, they couldn't get the hoods to shut is what they are saying. They also say Nascar gave them the go ahead to modify the louver pieces so the hoods would shut. Nascar is saying they went farther with the mods.It would be very easy for Nascar to go to the supplier and take some to have scanned to see what the tolerances were. If I remember right there was some discussion on here awhile back and we were assured how there would be no difference in part measurements
And I'm staying by my original statement - make the parts right in the first place and teams wouldn't have to modify them. You can't be mad that teams modified the "parts that can't be modified" to your liking under your directionThat depends on the tolerances built into the specific parts. All manufactured parts have a tolerance. No parts are exactly the same. In this case, they couldn't get the hoods to shut is what they are saying. They also say Nascar gave them the go ahead to modify the louver pieces so the hoods would shut. Nascar is saying they went farther with the mods.