Formerjackman
Team Owner
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
- Messages
- 6,080
- Points
- 793
I am not sure if it is the equivalent of doing 37 in a 35 MPH.
1. When representing the same weight
Tungsten will contain less mass.
2. I have never used Tungsten, but I have to believe weighing a car out with a smaller piece is advantagous. A more exact placement or position could help to minimize the weight transfer. Even if it was on the right side as Elliot claims.
I think this is just important for tire wear as it is for speed. Brooks said that the Tungsten allows for mounting it lower and it provides a very small advantage.
3. Everyone is and was aware of how through tech inspection would be. I have a hard time believing a simple oversight occurred as claimed by Elliott. You go there knowing it is the room of doom. and it is what is....
4. If I remember correctly "No Tungsten" was boldly printed on the entry forms.
If that is true, how could the Snowball Derby ever have any credibility, if they had allowed a hypothetical 37 in a 35. What do you tell the driver's that followed the rules and didn't use the Tungsten?
All just my opinion.
I'm not saying Tungsten isn't an advantage, if it wasn't, people wouldn't spend big money on it. My point is that no matter what the car still has to weigh the same and the advantage is small. In a Cup race, it MIGHT make a difference. In the Derby? who knows. I don't know anything, but my guess it was just a matter of the team using what they had and were used to using, and not paying close enough attention to the rule book. It does happen, especially if you are running somewhere you don't normally run. I helped a team that had never run ANY NASCAR race try to field a truck at Nashville Superspeedway. TONS of things had to be fixed, because the team just didn't know the NASCAR inspection process and what will fly and not fly. There was no intent to cheat, it was all just unfamiliarity and oversight, even though most of it was clearly in the rule book. Probably the guy that put the tungsten in was probably not the guy that read the entry blank. Let me just close by saying that I'm not arguing the rule or that they broke it or that they shouldn't have been disqualified. All I'm saying is it not a big deal, and I think it's unfair to try to disparage Chase because a car he happened to drive had the wrong part on it.
i