@Snappy D is not a deathbedder who takes pleasure in NASCAR misfortune. I think we can debate the subject without making fun of each other. He's making a different argument regarding potential business benefits of a shortened season. I don't think his IndyCar comparison is well founded, as that series is much smaller and full of financial struggles. Very few are making good money there compared to NASCAR.
However, judging by recent comments from Steve Phelps, some consolidation is clearly being considered, so there must be a potential benefit in the eyes of some. When asked about the reports of a decreased schedule, his answer wasn't to say we're happy with where we're at. It was that they definitely won't be increasing the number of races, and that there is no specifc number on the table. When Harvick advocated getting rid of the Clash, he said it in the context of "when we do the new schedule."
I can see both sides of the argument. There are racing series I enjoy and follow that last for 9+ months, and there are ones I like that only last for 4-5. More isn't always better, but less is no guarantee of anything either.