I don't think the change is inauthentic on Kyle's part. I think what you may be implying here is that his change is due to circumstance, and isn't natural within the course of his life. His career taking a hit has forced him to re-evaluate his own racism, rather than naturally becoming sensitive to it, perhaps. As a result, we can't know authentic it is. I get that.
Would he have gone through this change if he didn't get in trouble? Probably not. Is there a professional motivation for him to change now? Yes.
So when do we start to value the behavior for change, instead of assessing his motivation for change?
I'm not sure this makes it inauthentic, and I'm not sure that not knowing Kyle's true motivation negates the effort he's put into change. It does make it circumstantial. I've long believed that we have to make mistakes to truly grow. Sometimes, we really need to **** up in order to make deep, personal changes. Whether it's a slow path that leads us towards change, or it's an event that rattles us to our core, sometimes a mistake can result in authentic change. A drug addict may not want to change for the right reasons, until he ***** up. Does that make it wrong for him to change? Yes, Kyle's change is circumstantial, but maybe this is the kick in the butt he needed to experience authentic change. Maybe Kyle was never meant to be sensitive to racial injustice without such a mistake. Maybe a supposed circumstantial inauthentic change is what guides him towards real change.
I do think his efforts are genuine, and being the child of an interacial couple himself, Kyle really may be learning from this experience. He's the the driver who said the N word. He could be a phony who followed the rules to get his job back. Or he can become a symbol of unlearning racism due to personal circumstance.
Either way, like DW said, "what you don't know, you don't know". I guess we have to wait and see.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk