I think part of it has to do with the way he made his way to the big time. For him, it was serious business to win. Winning meant prize money --- that money meant he could pay back the loan he took out in order to race. That money also meant he could put some food on the table. In order to race, he worked in the mills in Kannapolis --- he was one of the "lint-heads". He also worked in a welding shop building trailers. When his father died, DE was the major breadwinner for the family --- at age 22. His first race car was pink --- because there wasn't enough of any one color to paint the whole car, so they mixed the leftovers together.So I may get jumped for this... but I've been curious for a while now....
From what I've heard about Dale Earnhardt Sr.... he pushed a lot of people out of the way, wrecked, bumped, and otherwise "intimidated" his way through the field a lot.. Why was it okay for him to do that stuff and not get jumped on like pretty much anyone that would do it today? I mean what was so great about the guy? I get that he was fast and won a lot of races and championships.. but how many of those races and championships did he just wreck his way into winning? I seriously asking because I don't know.. The reputation that he has IMO is o a guy that would wreck you if he couldn't beat you.. I obviously don't know fully but I don't like that back then it made someone one of the greatest of all time and now everyone cries when a guy makes contact? I suppose it's a lot of "no one remembers who finished second" type thing.. he got the trophies and guys like me don't know how he got which ones etc.. So all we see is all those wins and cups... but how many times did fans leave the track pissed off at him making some stupid move and dumping their driver to win? I don't see that stuff because I see wins.. numbers.. which are all that matters... but what really bugs me is that if some driver were to start wrecking people for wins they get scrutinized.. I mean damn even Joey was scrutinized for moving Mark out of the way at Pocono.. but the numbers remain and eventually no will remember that he moved Mark... just that he won that race..... is that the same kind of situation here? Between that and respect for him because of his death?
I guess my main thing is... why was it okay for him and not okay for these guys today? .. and how many of his "fans" weren't even his fans until his death? I'm not trying to be a dick.. I'm just curious.. There had to have been a lot of people who didn't like him.. but looking back he is an icon because he had the numbers and lost his life, which in turn brought NASCAR into a new safety era and had an overall positive affect on the sport as a whole.. but how much of the love for him is only because of that?
Please.. don't jump all over me for this one guys, I'm actually asking a serious question.
The hard-working, blue-collar folks that bought the tickets could identify with him ---- he was one of them. If you look at pictures of him in his early days, there was nothing about him that was polished and clean. He was rough around the edges because life was rough.
His tactics on the track were really no worse than anyone else's. He was just better at it than most.