Blaze
The Midnight Rider
I kind of want this to happen at Homestead, just to see what would happen.
MONEY< MONEY< MONEY is the only language the team owners understand. Never mind sending anyone home, they are all replaceable and is not a deterrent.It seems that there is growing sentiment to make the penalties stronger - certainly the key media seem to think it it justified.
I wonder if it’s gonna be crew chief suspensions? A one race penalty for the crew chief has to be worse on a team than a two race suspension and on the car chief - I would think.
I suppose upping the point penalty could also encourage compliance, especiallly as the season progresses and just a few guys getting all of the wins.
Not enough by far. Forget the suspensions and triple the fines and then double for every repeat.In post 14, Scott Miller talked about ramping up the L1 penalty if teams didn't cut it out.
L1 penalties concern areas of minimum heights and weights, the Laser Inspection Station (LIS), gear ratios, and flagrant lug nut violations where 17 or fewer are properly secured. Penalties will be a 10-40 point deduction, suspension for 1-3 races, plus a fine up to $75,000.
Some people are so lazy that they just copy other peoples ideas. This is true even when they get caught cheating. Car chiefs need to be able to say "NO" when a CC tells them to cheat.
Car chiefs are not the problem and they should not be the ones paying the penalty.
Fine "Team Owners" like they did MW and it will stop real fast. About $250,000 the first time
and add $50,000 each repetitive offence. hat means HMS will have paid $550,00 for the #9 repetitive attempt to cheat.
So this one is photoshopped too. Exactly the same from different angle.I have Adobe photoshop too. It’s a really good application.
They do it because cost of fine is less than benefits. IF they are going to police every possible thing then they either need to make it hurt financially or park the car next week.The video shows it clearly and looks smooth to me so I don't think the stills are photo shopped. Also, doesn't make sense to me if it was caused by contact why not appeal. I am stumped as to why teams keep doing this.
They do it because cost of fine is less than benefits. IF they are going to police every possible thing then they either need to make it hurt financially or park the car next week.
MONEY< MONEY< MONEY is the only language the team owners understand. Never mind sending anyone home, they are all replaceable and is not a deterrent.
first fine should be $100,000 and keep doubling it every other violation that is the same.
Now you will have their attention.
As do I. The video posted in the Kansas race thread shows the window perfectly straight until after contact. Penalty probably only given to prevent scrutiny from teams and fans.
Car chiefs need to be able to say "NO" when a CC tells them to cheat.
You heard the earth is flat, right?Really?
The problem is it's subjective. I wonder how many other cars had sagging windows that din't get inspected? Bigger points penalties seem like a better deterrent. But the "whoever wins the last race" thing would have to go away. I had ZERO issue with Kenseth's championship. Nobody else seemed to want to win so he backed up to the table and slid the trophy off in his pocket. "sorrry"..."nothing to see here"...The beatings will continue until morale improves. Okay, so it doesn't really apply here..... I just like that saying.
Anyhow, I'm guessing the only way to curtail the window shenanigans is to increase the response to the infraction going forward. The ride/car sitting out a race would be a huge punishment. I'm not sure that's one that a sponsor would endure. Points penalty increase, fine increase, maybe that driver having to be substituted for..... I don't know.
Love this idea. I really wouldn't have a big problem with Nascar mandating the teams run stock bodies. Go back to what they did 35 years ago. Make 90% of the body be OEM. How does sports car racing police the bodies?Just for giggles, I'd like to see NASCAR go back to taking the offending pieces off the car and putting them on display.
If a car doesn't fit the specs first time thru inspection, take a saw, cut off what doesn't fit and say "try again".
Still don't get any of this. I also don't think it's the teams doing it by design.
They take away fuel capacity so a faster car has to pit more often or add weight for the most part.Love this idea. I really wouldn't have a big problem with Nascar mandating the teams run stock bodies. Go back to what they did 35 years ago. Make 90% of the body be OEM. How does sports car racing police the bodies?
people whine about Nascar's inspection systemI'm talking about a Porsche looking like a Porsche. Put two side-by-side AFTER the race. Do they allow the body panels to move assuming no contact?
I've been swayed by the new evidence.Really?
Good thing you weren't skewed. That gets a fine and a time-out!I've been swayed by the new evidence.
NASCAR has painted itself into a corner. Unless they back off on all of this bull****, this sport will continue to suffer. I have been pretty easy on NASCAR forever. No more. This is the single most stupid ******* era I have ever seen. Nobody is talking racing anymore. It's this bull****. Why? Because NASCAR sits on social media, and thinks that this is what the fans want. It isn't. Let the cars go. Lie about their legality. Let the people speculate. Who gives a sh!t? This has been going on forever. The difference now is that NASCAR decides that they should do something about it. They can't, and there has to be someone in the NASCAR regime that understands that. Has to be. My God, the whole motivation for this is this bull**** concept of parity. Millions on the OSS. Hours in inspection. Penalties. Fines. Suspensions. All in the name of parity.....AND YOU HAVE ONE GUY WINNING 5 OF 12 RACES!!!! TWO GUYS WINNING 8 OF 12. ALL OF THIS bull**** FOR .....WAIT FOR IT.....PARITY! WHERE THE **** IS THE PARITY?!!!! YOU. WILL. NEVER. GET. IT. MY GOD THIS IS KILLING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you, and yes, I feel better.
Silenzio, per favore!^^ LMAO. @Revman comes out of the closet, declares that he is a "Run what ya brung" advocate, and gets an ovation (ironically, from a man sporting a Bowtie). Meanwhile, it is the Ford contingent that has full F1 capabilities in-house... Haas F1.
Just for the record, I believe Nascar adopting a "run what ya brung" philosophy would be a quick, non-stop way to financial suicide.
^^ LMAO. @Revman comes out of the closet, declares that he is a "Run what ya brung" advocate, and gets an ovation (ironically, from a man sporting a Bowtie). Meanwhile, it is the Ford contingent that has full F1 capabilities in-house... Haas F1.
Just for the record, I believe Nascar adopting a "run what ya brung" philosophy would be a quick, non-stop way to financial suicide.
I suspect the teams have been playing with all kinds of panels that flex at speed and return to spec for some time now. They probably continue trying because it has been working for awhile. There is always a time lag before NASCAR figures out what they are doing; they do take cars for further examination sometimes (such as taking them to a wind tunnel).This makes me wonder if the teams just figured out that the windows will flex and just chance it in hopes that it returns to shape for post race inspection?
I suspect the teams have been playing with all kinds of panels that flex at speed and return to spec for some time now. They probably continue trying because it has been working for awhile. There is always a time lag before NASCAR figures out what they are doing; they do take cars for further examination sometimes (such as taking them to a wind tunnel).
Yes they do but they are so small it is looked as small change for the big picture. I doubt Nascar really intends to stop this, they just want money in the fund.I’m about 93% sure the owner/team pays those fines administered to crew/car chief..