- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 26,697
- Points
- 1,033
No more than he drops the 2s because the poster got drunk and fell asleep.Do you drop the ones like: "10 because my driver won"?
No more than he drops the 2s because the poster got drunk and fell asleep.Do you drop the ones like: "10 because my driver won"?
Inexplicably there were three 10's believe it or not, although only two counted toward the average as I always drop the highest and the lowest.
No more than he drops the 2s because the poster got drunk and fell asleep.
I don't, but I drop the highest and lowest because some posters rate every race a 1 or a 10 regardless of how good or bad the race was, dropping the highest and lowest counters that a bit.Do you drop the ones like: "10 because my driver won"?
That kinda crap was one reason that I was relieved to see you start doing it.I don't, but I drop the highest and lowest because some posters rate every race a 1 or a 10 regardless of how good or bad the race was, dropping the highest and lowest counters that a bit.
I also throw out overly convoluted ratings (i.e. "I give the first 60 laps a 10, the next 40 laps a 2, the last 60 laps a 5, and -1 for debris cautions") and partial race ratings (i.e. "I only saw the last 10 laps, but I give it an 8"). Ratings for non-race related stuff like the broadcast or the announcers are also not factored in.
Yeah, it was a 3.68 last year I believe.That's a big step up from last year.
1. Bristol (4/24): 9.27
2. Martinsville (4/2): 8.94
3. Richmond (4/30): 8.66
4. Kansas (5/13): 8.31
5. Sonoma (6/25): 8.09
6. Las Vegas (3/12): 8.08
7. Phoenix (3/19): 8.03
8. Pocono (6/11): 7.85
9. Talladega (5/7): 7.62
10. Dover (6/4): 7.61
11. Fontana (3/26): 7.59
12. Daytona (7/1): 7.57
13. Daytona (2/26): 7.46
14. New Hampshire (7/16): 7.16
15. Indianapolis (7/23): 7.00
16. Michigan (6/18): 6.93
17. Texas (4/9): 6.80
18. Atlanta (3/5): 6.55
19. Charlotte (5/28): 6.00
20. Pocono (7/30): 5.64
21. Kentucky (7/8): 4.58
I was happy to see Kyle win, but it definitely wasn't as good as the June race. I think Blaney winning that one probably helped its rating too.A precipitous drop over the first Pocono race. It is hard to tell if the lower rating for the second race was due to perceived inferior racing or some of the fans fans were constipated or hungover thus not feeling so good thus resulting in a lower rating.
I find it interesting that these two poles are so close togetherI was happy to see Kyle win, but it definitely wasn't as good as the June race. I think Blaney winning that one probably helped its rating too.
What the heck happened between first and second Pocono to produce such a swing in opinion? Was it just everyone bitching about Kyle?
Better finish that's for sure, Blaney and Kyle Damn Busch battled for the win numerous laps at the end, compared to a lopsided runaway win this time. To me it was more luck than skill on that track to have a close finish. Pocono isn't known for close finishes IMO. Remember last year Buescher won Poke 2 in the fog.What the heck happened between first and second Pocono to produce such a swing in opinion? Was it just everyone bitching about Kyle?
It sounds like you're talking about TV ratings. I'm talking about the '1 to 10' rating we give races here. In theory the range of numbers here would be on similar bell-shaped curves regardless of how many people participated (given a statistically significant sampling). I don't think the factors you cited would affect the opinions of those RF members who watched the race.Time of year plays a part. July means people are outside, on vacation, and have other things to do before kids/grand kids head back to school.
To me, the big difference was the gap (more like chasm) between the speed of the six Toyotas versus everyone else. Pocono 1 was much more of a level field. That lack of competitiveness makes a poor race. (I can enjoy a beatdown when it is my preferred team that is dominating... but it still makes for a poor race IMO.)What the heck happened between first and second Pocono to produce such a swing in opinion? Was it just everyone bitching about Kyle?
Ouch. That's pretty harsh. I didn't think the Pocono races were that different besides who won and how long the run to the finish was. If NASCAR had a 10-to-go caution in every race I bet this place, and others, would actually eat it up.1. Bristol (4/24): 9.27
2. Martinsville (4/2): 8.94
3. Richmond (4/30): 8.66
4. Kansas (5/13): 8.31
5. Sonoma (6/25): 8.09
6. Las Vegas (3/12): 8.08
7. Phoenix (3/19): 8.03
8. Pocono (6/11): 7.85
9. Talladega (5/7): 7.62
10. Dover (6/4): 7.61
11. Fontana (3/26): 7.59
12. Daytona (7/1): 7.57
13. Daytona (2/26): 7.46
14. New Hampshire (7/16): 7.16
15. Indianapolis (7/23): 7.00
16. Michigan (6/18): 6.93
17. Texas (4/9): 6.80
18. Atlanta (3/5): 6.55
19. Charlotte (5/28): 6.00
20. Pocono (7/30): 5.64
21. Kentucky (7/8): 4.58
2 mile and a halfs in the top 11, but let's keep giving them more dates
1. Bristol (4/24): 9.27
2. Martinsville (4/2): 8.94
3. Richmond (4/30): 8.66
4. Kansas (5/13): 8.31
5. Sonoma (6/25): 8.09
6. Las Vegas (3/12): 8.08
7. Phoenix (3/19): 8.03
8. Bristol (8/19): 7.98
9. Pocono (6/11): 7.85
10. Talladega (5/7): 7.62
11. Dover (6/4): 7.61
12. Fontana (3/26): 7.59
13. Daytona (7/1): 7.57
14. Daytona (2/26): 7.46
15. Darlington (9/3): 7.23
16. New Hampshire (7/16): 7.16
17. Indianapolis (7/23): 7.00
18. Michigan (8/13): 6.97
19. Watkins Glen (8/6): 6.95
20. Michigan (6/18): 6.93
21. Texas (4/9): 6.80
22. Atlanta (3/5): 6.55
23. Charlotte (5/28): 6.00
24. Pocono (7/30): 5.64
25. Kentucky (7/8): 4.58
The ratings were all over the place for this race.On one hand I am surprised that Darlington scored as low as it did but on the other I am surprised it scored as high as it did if that makes any sense at all. I would have given the race about a 3-4 had I rated it but I thought I would pass because I didn't think I could be objective. If I went off things other than race quality I would have given it a 10 just due to Ned.
The ratings were all over the place for this race.
If Kyle Busch had won, they would've been mostly sub 5I seem to remember a lot of sub 5 ratings but there were 8's and 9's too. Different strokes!
Denny Hamlin isn't exactly Mr. Popular in these parts either, but I think most people at least respect what he did coming back from that pitting incident.If Kyle Busch had won, they would've been mostly sub 5
1. Bristol (4/24): 9.27
2. Martinsville (4/2): 8.94
3. Richmond (4/30): 8.66
4. Kansas (5/13): 8.31
5. Sonoma (6/25): 8.09
6. Las Vegas (3/12): 8.08
7. Phoenix (3/19): 8.03
8. Bristol (8/19): 7.98
9. Pocono (6/11): 7.85
10. Talladega (5/7): 7.62
11. Dover (6/4): 7.61
12. Fontana (3/26): 7.59
13. Daytona (7/1): 7.57
14. Daytona (2/26): 7.46
15. Darlington (9/3): 7.23
16. New Hampshire (7/16): 7.16
17. Indianapolis (7/23): 7.00
18. Michigan (8/13): 6.97
19. Watkins Glen (8/6): 6.95
20. Michigan (6/18): 6.93
21. Texas (4/9): 6.80
22. Richmond (9/9): 6.61
23. Atlanta (3/5): 6.55
24. Charlotte (5/28): 6.00
25. Pocono (7/30): 5.64
26. Kentucky (7/8): 4.58