CamelPowered
Jimmy Spencer Never Forgets!
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 4,173
- Points
- 593
You don't think for one minute that SHR can replace Penske do you?
No.
You don't think for one minute that SHR can replace Penske do you?
Just as a yuge sponsor is announced to SHR?Maybe 3 for Daytona, but after that all bets are off.
Car count doesn't really matter. As long as the best of the best are out there every week, who cares? The field is plenty healthy as it is.
Just as a yuge sponsor is announced to SHR?
#4
#10
#14
#41
You can bank on that.
Those charters are gonna get seriously de-valued if less than 36 cars attempt the races every week.
I always thought it was overhyped.
They aren't worth much NOW. How many races lately have had more than 40 entries? Why buy a charter if there is little to no risk of missing a race? I was against the damn things in the first place. To me, they just subsidize mediocrity, and provide a barrier to new and potentially better teams joining the series. I'm much more of the NHRA philosophy. The fastest 16 race and everybody else goes home, whether you are Joe Blow or John Force. The idea that the charters would ever be worth a fraction of what most of the teams have invested in their operations was fantasy anyway. If you've ever been to a race team auction, you know it's a pennies on the dollar kind of deal. The value in a team is the contracts with sponsors, drivers, and key team members. Without them you basically have a garage sale.
Got that, ask DW or other drivers who tried and closed shop. Today just take a look at Petty, no shop and a trailer load of tools. The Charters were free to 36 teams and the only person I know who made a penny was Kaufman. Yes the owners got more purse money compared to a non charter team but no team is racing for that little difference. The teams race in the hope of landing 12-15 million in sponsor money.They aren't worth much NOW. How many races lately have had more than 40 entries? Why buy a charter if there is little to no risk of missing a race? I was against the damn things in the first place. To me, they just subsidize mediocrity, and provide a barrier to new and potentially better teams joining the series. I'm much more of the NHRA philosophy. The fastest 16 race and everybody else goes home, whether you are Joe Blow or John Force. The idea that the charters would ever be worth a fraction of what most of the teams have invested in their operations was fantasy anyway. If you've ever been to a race team auction, you know it's a pennies on the dollar kind of deal. The value in a team is the contracts with sponsors, drivers, and key team members. Without them you basically have a garage sale.
They're worth whatever someone who wants one is willing to pay.They aren't worth much NOW. How many races lately have had more than 40 entries? Why buy a charter if there is little to no risk of missing a race? I was against the damn things in the first place. To me, they just subsidize mediocrity, and provide a barrier to new and potentially better teams joining the series. I'm much more of the NHRA philosophy. The fastest 16 race and everybody else goes home, whether you are Joe Blow or John Force. The idea that the charters would ever be worth a fraction of what most of the teams have invested in their operations was fantasy anyway. If you've ever been to a race team auction, you know it's a pennies on the dollar kind of deal. The value in a team is the contracts with sponsors, drivers, and key team members. Without them you basically have a garage sale.
You're going to get one if you agree to lease or buy one ... there's no other way. NASCAR doesn't control this aspect of the business.The thing is, if you show up and race every week for long enough, you're probably going to get one anyway. Some day they MIGHT have some value again, but we are a LONG way from that. I guess if you could buy one for on the cheap, go ahead.
Interestingly, Roger Penske, a self-made billionaire and race team owner for the past 50 years, is adding another car to his stable for 2018.
He's probably suffering from Doomsday Aversion Syndrome.
The thing is, if you show up and race every week for long enough, you're probably going to get one anyway. Some day they MIGHT have some value again, but we are a LONG way from that. I guess if you could buy one for on the cheap, go ahead.
https://nesn.com/2017/06/haas-to-keep-four-teams-in-2018-but-maybe-not-danica-patrick-kurt-busch/Interestingly, Gene Haas, a self-made billionaire and race team owner for the past 25 years, is deleting another car to his stable for 2018.
He's probably suffering from Doomsday Aversion Syndrome.
I'll pass that on to Tommy Baldwin.I just think the charters are something to make people think they were doing something, and they really didn't.
https://nesn.com/2017/06/haas-to-keep-four-teams-in-2018-but-maybe-not-danica-patrick-kurt-busch/
You're so eager ... and so inept.
I'll pass that on to Tommy Baldwin.
If Gene was committed to 4 cars next year why not just sign Kurt Busch to a deal to drive one if his 4 cars? Also the age of your article has even expired for use as a bird cage liner. Watch and learn!
The point seems lost on you. He sold the paper for 7 figures. He paid nothing for it.yeah, I just read an old story where Baldwin was saying it would allow him to plan for the future and build his team.. Who was one of the first to bail?
From you? Not possible.If Gene was committed to 4 cars next year why not just sign Kurt Busch to a deal to drive one if his 4 cars? Also the age of your article has even expired for use as a bird cage liner. Watch and learn!
Well for one thing, if you out and out tell people you are running the car sponsor or no sponsor, you just lowered the value of that sponsorship. I think Gene's playing the game, but my money is on the 41 being on the track next year.