While I agree on certain points, it's likely to happen and it makes no sense when the entire game has been skewed in the offense's favor, I'd rather not have it taken to a further degree where you're so offensive centric you require a possession because you can't get off the field on defense.
There was nothing unfair about the way the Bills lost this game, and nobody was clamoring for an OT rule change until something like this happens and they don't get what they want to see. It's a team sport and Buffalo lost because they gave up a fieldgoal drive in 13 seconds, and then gave up a touchdown drive the length of the field. Make a stop and you win, make a stop and you get the ball back, do neither and you lose, I don't see anything wrong with that. And I certainly don't feel bad for the Bills just so Josh Allen gets to touch the football again? institute a rule change? why is everyone so sure the result would be different? Buffalo played a hell of a game and so did Josh Allen but there's nothing to feel bad about here.
It just highlights a singular instance where perceived unfairness takes place that doesn't exist. imo.