StandOnIt
Farm Truck
last time I looked, I don't see those courses on the schedule.^ Not much side by side through Eau Rouge either, before Spa was castrated by curbs that aren't curbs and cars that have excessive downforce and drag.
last time I looked, I don't see those courses on the schedule.^ Not much side by side through Eau Rouge either, before Spa was castrated by curbs that aren't curbs and cars that have excessive downforce and drag.
I think they ****** up the first two turns a lot. To be expected from the Xfinity guys, I guess. Good circuit though. The promoter for that race actually wanted to bring Cup in or run the Xfinity race at 10 or 11 AM. NASCAR didn't budge on either and that was that.For some reason, I recall Gilles as a wreckfest when the X series was there.
Tradition is a lousy reason to do something, esp. if it's the only reason. NASCAR 'traditionally' didn't go there, and for a lot longer than they have been.Some fans enjoy the diversity of the season-long test and paying homage to motorsport history and traditions. That's why F1 needs to race at Monaco, and why Nascar needs to race at Indy on the oval. JMO.
By this line of thinking, we should have a lot more restrictor plate races since they get the best attendance and the best ratings.Indy may be a challenge for the drivers but it's a snoozefest to watch. NASCAR is in the business of entertaining fans, not challenging drivers.
Just because I wouldn't like that doesn't mean it couldn't be a profitable business model.By this line of thinking, we should have a lot more restrictor plate races since they get the best attendance and the best ratings.
It wouldn't be. The drivers and teams hate them. There would definitely be a drop in car count, and the fans who don't like them would leave the sport as well. 4 is enough.Just because I wouldn't like that doesn't mean it couldn't be a profitable business model.
There you go again, claiming to speak for everyone. Such omniscience is amazing, especially without even taking the trouble to watch the races.Old time fans of stock car racing couldn't care less about running on the artifact.
By this line of thinking, we should have a lot more restrictor plate races since they get the best attendance and the best ratings.
... Getting rid of the restrictor plate tracks, would be like Indy no longer racing at Indy. The sport would cease to exist. ...
Which reminds me, the Go Bowling 400 at the Kansas 1.5er last weekend was one helluva fine race,
My point is on a road course, hard to pass short track, pocono, rp track, or a dirt track, maybe a guy like blaney can use the one line track to hold a guy like truex back, instead of everyone running full throttle, and the car that is just a gnats ass better, can win with virtually no pressure from behind. And yeah, you'll have snoozers everywhere, but it is the exact same outcome at these cookie cutters, unless there is a caution and everyone decides to pit with a dozen or so laps to go.Truex won by 1.10 seconds, led the last 19 laps. Someone had to win, I'm sorry it wasn't your favorite. My opinion is that it was a really good race, hard fought at the front and throughout the field, with the outcome in doubt until the very end. A lot of people agreed...
Race poll results R-F.
Race poll results Gluck.
I am sorry, but I can not even think about considering agreeing with this, so on that logic, NASCAR should also be racing at Monaco, because its traditional track , heck, why not the Baja 1000 thats a traditional race, just because its tradition in other forms of motorsports, does not mean it needs to be for NASCAR or in NASCAR, NASCAR needs to be NASCAR.Some fans enjoy the diversity of the season-long test and paying homage to motorsport history and traditions. That's why F1 needs to race at Monaco, and why Nascar needs to race at Indy on the oval. JMO.
I am sorry, but I can not even think about considering agreeing with this, so on that logic, NASCAR should also be racing at Monaco, because its traditional track , heck, why not the Baja 1000 thats a traditional race, just because its tradition in other forms of motorsports, does not mean it needs to be for NASCAR or in NASCAR, NASCAR needs to be NASCAR.
Its my sole opinion that IMS has no business being on the schedule .
Four dirt tracks would be a big improvement to the schedule, but I don't hear that many people asking for that.
Actually if NASCAR were to go overseas I'd love to see a race at Spa. Just a bad fast track
I could see them maybe doing Eldora eventually but 4 is just to much in my opinion. Also demand for tickets would be high and alot of people would probably get turned away. I'll say though I'd rather bave a dirt track over as road course any day.
Tell ya what, I watched a Global Rallycross race last Sunday that had me on the edge of my seat and it was mostly a dirt road race. (in the mud. )How about a dirt road course? Just kidding. I don't think I have seen anybody as passionate as you are, about keeping NASCAR as American as possible. It is a uniquely American sport, but there is always room for improvement.
How about a dirt road course? Just kidding. I don't think I have seen anybody as passionate as you are, about keeping NASCAR as American as possible. It is a uniquely American sport, but there is always room for improvement.
Tell ya what, I watched a Global Rallycross race last Sunday that had me on the edge of my seat and it was mostly a dirt road race. (in the mud. )
Tradition is a lousy reason to do something, esp. if it's the only reason. NASCAR 'traditionally' didn't go there, and for a lot longer than they have been.
Well I'll second that us old time fans really don't care about Indy. We'd rather have some tracks like Darlington, Martinsville, and North Wilkesboro on the schedule.There you go again, claiming to speak for everyone. Such omniscience is amazing, especially without even taking the trouble to watch the races.
Well I'll second that us old time fans really don't care about Indy. We'd rather have some tracks like Darlington, Martinsville, and North Wilkesboro on the schedule.
Eldora (or another dirt track) will almost assuredly be on the Cup schedule within 5 years. The demand for a dirt track in Cup is way too high for NASCAR to not pull the trigger on it, especially considering they are desperate to attract & retain fans. 4 dirst tracks per year would be ideal IMO, along with 4 road courses.I could see them maybe doing Eldora eventually but 4 is just to much in my opinion. Also demand for tickets would be high and alot of people would probably get turned away. I'll say though I'd rather bave a dirt track over as road course any day.
Eldora (or another dirt track) will almost assuredly be on the Cup schedule within 5 years. The demand for a dirt track in Cup is way too high for NASCAR to not pull the trigger on it, especially considering they are desperate to attract & retain fans. 4 dirst tracks per year would be ideal IMO, along with 4 road courses.
Nascar has raced road courses since the beginning. The first road course that I attended was at Daytona Beach in I believe 1953 or 54.
You would think would test this out in the regular season first before making it a Chase race. I see this being a crash fest.Charlotte Road course confirmed for 2018 fall race. Also will be the cutoff race of round 1.
I'm referencing the more typical pack racing that we see at Talladega and Daytona. I believe they were interested in trying plates at Michigan to generate that sort of product at one point recently and even after the Kentucky aero experiment a couple of years ago Brian France said they still wanted "more pack racing". Restrictor plates at IMS won't work that way but might make the racing closer.hmmm might be why they are trying restrictor plates on the xfinity cars at Indy. You can be sure if it works even a little, the Cup cars will have a similar package to try to wake up the snore fest.