Charlie Spencer
Road courses and short tracks.
When a president or a governor uses the bully pulpit to encourage compliance, the percentage of people complying go up.Ah yes because when the government creates rules, everyone follows them. If a government creates rules that they themselves break, without consequence, there are no rules.
The Rep. gov. here in SC said he didn't support a mask mandate because it was 'unenforceable'. By that theory, there's no point in having a speed limit, a minimum age of alcohol, littering laws, shoplifting, or most laws on the books. But most people accept abiding by laws because that's what it takes to keep a social civilization running halfway smoothly.
If my neighbor, who can't tell if he's breathing viruses, insists on taking no action to stop his potential spreading of a disease, what recourse do you suggest society take? Should we allow Typhoid Mary to wander where she will, with those coming behind her hours later being unaware she's been there, potentially contaminating surfaces?
Mask laws are no different from the restrictions government imposed during WW2 to reserve resources for the war effort. Did everyone comply? Of course not, probably including many who imposed those restrictions. That doesn't mean they weren't a good idea, or that the majority's compliance didn't make a difference.
Last edited: