Whoa, what the heck did I just walk into?
I was always under the impression that if a case goes to a grand jury the DA would be trying to prove a certain charge is worthy of pursuit of full criminal charges. meaning the DA goes in front of them and says we think he is guilty of this charge and here is why. whereas if there are no charges they wish to persue they don't go to the grand jury. perhaps it really is just a CYA on the DA's part and they don't intend to be vigorous in proving anything and are just seeking a rubber stamp from the grand jury.
Small community probably has something to do with DA deciding to punt decision on charges to a grand jury. If he says no charges, residents could take it out on him in the next election.
Looks like he, Ontario County District Attorney R. Michael Tantillo, was reelected to a four year term in 2013. He ran unopposed for his 7th straight term. He's held that position since 1989.Small community probably has something to do with DA deciding to punt decision on charges to a grand jury. If he says no charges, residents could take it out on him in the next election.
CNN now carrying the story.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/16/us/tony-stewart-grand-jury/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
This has probably already been said numerous times in this thread, but I don't think that whatever happens from here on out will even matter to most people unless something really crazy goes down, like Tony getting booked for murder, which obviously ain't happening. Most people have long since made up their minds about this incident one way or another and have already found him innocent or guilty. A jury's verdict, if this thing even goes to trial, probably won't make much difference to them.I still do not think charges will be laid. If somehow things get topsy turvy and they do, motorsport everywhere will feel the pain.
Personally I think this is a racing tragedy, not a murder or manslaughter case.
Glad to see Tony cooperating 100%
Tony Stewart really should had watched this video.
That's a pretty awesome lecture. I remember seeing this video years ago. So much truth.
Because some bus stop lawyer on YouTube told me not to talk to police ever and you don't even need to raise your hands if they point their gun at you and I like to keep a little pot in my backpocket (hey it's legal in Colorado now) so I'm an internet lawyer and **** the police, I'm never talking to them ever and Tony Stewart should have done the same.What is his other option? To be non-cooperative? That would raise even more eyebrows. Tony is doing the right thing.
Because some bus stop lawyer on YouTube told me not to talk to police ever and you don't even need to raise your hands if they point their gun at you and I like to keep a little pot in my backpocket (hey it's legal in Colorado now) so I'm an internet lawyer and **** the police, I'm never talking to them ever and Tony Stewart should have done the same.
/sarcasm
I've seen that clip, it's been around forever. There's another clip somewhere I can't find at the moment of a police officer explaining why that clip is total bull**** and only going to get you in more trouble.Did you watch even a minute of that clip? Might save you some trouble imo.
Obviously not saying Tony should have or shouldn't have talked to police. He did the right thing in doing so but THERE is such a thing as beeing too cooperative.
This whole deal is like a bad nightmare, my enthusiasm for NASCAR has basically gone up in Smoke. It's still tough to believe this is happening when these NFL player's get away with everything under the sun and Tony was just doing something he loves. Just don't make no sense.
I think you missed the sarcasm tag.Did you watch even a minute of that clip? Might save you some trouble imo.
Obviously not saying Tony should have or shouldn't have talked to police. He did the right thing in doing so but THERE is such a thing as beeing too cooperative.
I'm not trying to be antagonistic here, but this statement doesn't seem based on logic or reality. Which NFL players have succeeded in getting away with what exactly? Unless we're talking about Wes Welker doing a little Molly during the off-season, it would seem that the players drawing the most ire for terrible off-field behavior are being forced to sit down regardless of what the criminal justice system determined.
Tony Stewart (who I believe is likely innocent) is lucky he is not in the NFL. He is lucky the media scrutiny is not nearly as strong in NASCAR. There is no way in hell an NFL player under grand jury investigation for the intentional or negligent taking of another life would sniff the field.
This is what happens when all the decision making power is given to one single brain.(un) Luckily as another poster mentioned the NFL is embroiled in controversy after controversy
Stewart will prob take a back seat for now
I've seen that clip, it's been around forever. There's another clip somewhere I can't find at the moment of a police officer explaining why that clip is total bull**** and only going to get you in more trouble.
This is what happens when all the decision making power is given to one single brain.
Well, if you combine Roger Goodell and Brian France's brains, you MIGHT get one whole single brain.
If the RTA gets one thing accomplished, I hope it's getting Brian France and his cronies removed somehow.
this.....from a law school graduate ??
Yeah yeah, the organizational structure of NASCAR makes removing France a virtual impossibility but it's a nice pipe dream.
Nah, it could happen. His sister and uncle still own stakes in the company. They could get tired of his bull**** and 'fire' him. It happened in IndyCar. Tony George ran IMS and IndyCar for his mother and sisters (all on the board of directors) and eventually they got so tired of him pissing away the family fortune he was fired by his own family.Yeah yeah, the organizational structure of NASCAR makes removing France a virtual impossibility but it's a nice pipe dream.
thought maybe "don sterling hostile takeover " was bein taught now ?
The Frances have a pretty "hostile takeover" proof outfit. Even you had him "fired" from being CEO, he still owns enough shares to have influence. You'd have to fire him and then get him to divest his shares in the company. If NASCAR were a public company, a shareholder could probably file a derivative lawsuit against France. NASCAR's board would then have to appoint a "special litigation committee" to investigate France and that could shut the suit down (it's more complicated that that but go with it). In the event however that he got past THAT barrier and went to court, France would likely have the benefit of the business judgment presumption. Courts generally assume that the CEO of the company is acting in the best interest of the company and you have to prove that they're not.
Like I said, pipe dream.
Kevin's scenario is the most likely scenario for getting Brian out of power.
ie ......don sterling....nba
brian.... rta
plus....voting vs non voting class shares
Yeah, Class A vs. Class B shares are certainly an issue. A smart businessman keeps enough voting shares to ensure that he remains in power as he uses an IPO as a revenue generator.
common / preferred
hey nb .....whole point was rta will never have nba type power .