Dr_B_UNC
Team Owner
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2018
- Messages
- 8,620
- Points
- 793
Definitely helped acceptance of the Tundra with American truck buyers in my uneducated opinion.Toyota is way high on the showroom impact of its NASCAR involvement.
Definitely helped acceptance of the Tundra with American truck buyers in my uneducated opinion.Toyota is way high on the showroom impact of its NASCAR involvement.
Nonsense. This forum assured me during the initial rollout of the next-gen that teams would never modify a spec part...Been a few rumors of some teams manipulating the underbody more than others
nonsense. This forum said that modifying a spec part is going to be big problems. Kez already figured that out.Nonsense. This forum assured me during the initial rollout of the next-gen that teams would never modify a spec part...
Revisionist history on your part.nonsense. This forum said that modifying a spec part is going to be big problems. Kez already figured that out.
Neither is the Tundra. Shhhhhhhh.......It's not a V8
I think the fine line drawn is by the OEM, It's a $$$ dump and make it fit after that. There isn't any frame under a truck that is anywhere's close to stock, everybody has the same motor, no sheetmetal is the same. They look similar to a stock truck going by at 150 though lol.Fair point.
It's easy to criticize GM for the FWD models, it's easy to criticize Ford for a sedan, it's easy to criticize Toyota for the Supra.....but they can all be justified on some level. But a Honda Ridgeline in the Truck Series? It's not a V8 and it's not available in a regular cab -- because it's not a real body-on-frame pickup. It's a Pilot with the back cut off. Gotta draw the line somewhere.
To that point, I don't see the benefit for Honda. Why would they enter NASCAR when their product offerings don't relate?
And that's why I can't stand the sanctioning body. I swear it's a game of "who's line is it anyway". We make up the rules as we go along and points don't matterThings that make you go hmmm
Things that make you go hmmm
Again, unofficial RF Rule....Don't disrupt the narrative.The gerbils said when it happened that nascar recently changed the rule so that if it happens on pit road there won't be a penalty.
Again, unofficial RF Rule....Don't disrupt the narrative.
wow the only one paying attention to the endless drivel. There should be an award for that.The gerbils said when it happened that nascar recently changed the rule so that if it happens on pit road there won't be a penalty.
I'd be bored if it wasn't!Unless it's Rev's narrative....in that case, it's acceptable to disrupt
Friday 5: Hard hits have Cup drivers wondering what's happening
Some drivers have noted that they've experienced some of the hardest hits this season. NASCAR continues to study the issue.nascar.nbcsports.com
We cant be having this kind of death bedding here. In all seriousness the hits look harder to me, I noticed the cars not breaking up as much and now the drivers are admitting the hits are harder. Might be something to keep an eye on.nopenopnopenopenope all the rumors of the car being too stiff were totally false NASCAR was on top of it and any rumors you heard about this issue in the NextGen's development were false.
I've commented in race threads after hard hits the car does not seem to "shred" off parts as much as previous cars or have nearly as much damage. I've been told I'm wrong...
We cant be having this kind of death bedding here. In all seriousness the hits look harder to me, I noticed the cars not breaking up as much and now the drivers are admitting the hits are harder. Might be something to keep an eye on.
Don't know what to think about this one. Drivers say the hits are hard but appears onboard data doesn't agree. Crashes are way up and no one has been significantly hurt. I guess I wouldn't call this one a failure at this point
That's not exactly what he said. As they improved the programing he wasn't getting the output that he was in the original program. Not exactly wrong but now he didn't know what the he should be looking for anymore. I belive he said he wanted at 52 for wedge, well turns out he probably was never at 52 but whatever that number was is what they liked. After upgrades when they setup for that 52 it didn't do the same as the original 52. It's like using a bad caliper to measure. With the bad instrument you found what worked, but it wasn't actually what you thought it was.You know what they say about lies, damn lies and statistics, well data can be the same way. Listen to this weeks Dale Jr. Download where Tony Eury Jr. talks about using a HMS developed sim program that was producing great predicable results for the 88 team, but the HMS engineers kept finding “errors” in the sim. When they got done “fixing” it, Eury said it was useless and no longer corresponded with what Dale was feeling in the car.
Well, if the engineers had really nailed down the errors, they SHOULD be able to give you the new number that corresponds to what you had before, but it doesn't sound like that happened in either of those cases. It may well have been that the original data was not as far off as they thought. I am reminded of a comment I heard in a conversation at the track one. time. "That guy is REALLY sharp, but he has a way of adjusting a sixth place car all the way to fifteenth".That's not exactly what he said. As they improved the programing he wasn't getting the output that he was in the original program. Not exactly wrong but now he didn't know what the he should be looking for anymore. I belive he said he wanted at 52 for wedge, well turns out he probably was never at 52 but whatever that number was is what they liked. After upgrades when they setup for that 52 it didn't do the same as the original 52. It's like using a bad caliper to measure. With the bad instrument you found what worked, but it wasn't actually what you thought it was.
SHR had similar issues I belive last year. They found some error in the sim software that really led them down the wrong path. When the aero changes came out they thought they were getting back to what they had success with, but in reality they were significantly off.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
I listened to it...and I'll be honest, I get Jimmy Spencer vibes from Eury Jr. I didn't believe a word of drama out of his mouth. He's cooked.You know what they say about lies, damn lies and statistics, well data can be the same way. Listen to this weeks Dale Jr. Download where Tony Eury Jr. talks about using a HMS developed sim program that was producing great predicable results for the 88 team, but the HMS engineers kept finding “errors” in the sim. When they got done “fixing” it, Eury said it was useless and no longer corresponded with what Dale was feeling in the car.
What did he say that wasn't believable? The 8 and 15 team swap did indeed happenI listened to it...and I'll be honest, I get Jimmy Spencer vibes from Eury Jr. I didn't believe a word of drama out of his mouth. He's cooked.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Looks like the 34 went to R&D along with the yotas.
no?Remember when you guys told me this would never happen to spec parts?
I remember saying it wouldn't happen because they wouldn't get away with it and wasn't worth the penalties. And they didn't, and it wasn't.Remember when you guys told me this would never happen to spec parts?