ChexOrWrex
Ya gotta wanna
- Joined
- May 19, 2013
- Messages
- 27,605
- Points
- 883
The speculation is that the chassis is far too rigid and the body has a minimal amount of crumple zones.A design flaw?
The speculation is that the chassis is far too rigid and the body has a minimal amount of crumple zones.A design flaw?
@bitchesonmydick42069
Chase Briscoe confirms test wrecks resulting in dummy fatality.
Only makes the PR cover up worse. The cat is out the bag now.He deleted it, but I did see it beforehand. That seems less than encouraging.
Honestly isn’t too surprising when people learn that Dallara has never built this kind of chassis before. Now seeing that the chassis is built too stiff? Big oof.Also the spec chassis is coming from a sole supplier and they'll need additional time if it ends up taking NASCAR and Dallara several weeks/months to sort this all out. I've gotta think an official announcement of delaying the next-gen car will be released soon.
FYI for the posters who think Dallara built the chassis, Technique builds them
BingoI don't know how anyone could have an opinion on this without a lot more info. No specifics of the test have been released that I've heard as far as what impact was administered, what they consider safe limits or even if the current car would of passed the supposed failed test.
Some of these tests you administer impacts higher than ever recorded or beyond design parameters to see if this thing fails what manner does it fail in? Until you exceed the limits you don't know how it will fail, what's the "weak link" and how to improve it.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Dallara isn't building anything, Technique is building it. Dallara just designed it.Honestly isn’t too surprising when people learn that Dallara has never built this kind of chassis before. Now seeing that the chassis is built too stiff? Big oof.
There’s a price to pay for cost cutting.
Thanks for the clarification.Dallara isn't building anything, Technique is building it. Dallara just designed it.
I searched for that.Claim: car unsafe
Industry leaders and drivers: yes
My neighbor works for a team and we were discussing the next gen car earlier. (He's not on a cup team, but previously did work with one and has contacts/friends throughout. NASCAR is a very closed circle and incestuous business.) When I complained about the lower horsepower and slowing them down, he replied back then that it was because they "kept killing the dummies in crash tests when they'd back one into the fence." He said that the teams are frustrated because the Next Gen car is a fustercluck right now. Too rigid in crashes. Hotter than Satan's taint: they're burning drivers. The way they routed the exhaust in the chassis with exits at both sides is absolutely cooking the ****pit. NASCAR said to use "space tape" on the pipes. My friend said "at $10k a weekend per car on tape, we sure as hell aren't saving any money like they're saying." The new rim is a problem because they can't make them fast enough. The company is pumping them out 24/7 and still can't make enough. Some of it could be the teams losing autonomy and they don't like it. They want to build their own cars, not be beholden to parts manufacturers to get them everything in time to assemble.
Edit: The automatically censored word is the noun for where a pilot sits in the plane.
Chase Briscoe, the guys from the DBC podcast, a mechanic from MBM, and others have at minimum brushed or confirmed the topic. I suggest you look elsewhere.I searched for that.
Came up empty.
Didn't NASCAR already change that and go back to all exhaust on the right? Maybe I misread something.he way they routed the exhaust in the chassis with exits at both sides is absolutely cooking the ****pit.
Stellar lineup.
I'm a facts, logic and science guy. The physics and mechanical aspects of auto racing favor that.Have you ever believed a single rumor? You're welcome to be a skeptic in a sport where 75% of stuff you hear turns out to be false but come on...you don't think there's conceivably an ounce of truth to this?
I certainly think it's plausible. Plenty of leaks from plenty of people within the industry...enough that NASCAR had to send out a memo to drivers about it. So either they're all "in" on starting something false or there's some truth to what they're saying.
The reason I couldn't get on the hysteria wagon is because I am familiar with the science of destructive testing and non-destructive testing AND common sense. Nascar continues to make changes to the current cars or trucks in the interest of safety. They just added another bar to the rear of the roll cage in the truck series after a pretty heavy rear end collision. The changes are immediate, no B. S. ing about it just do it. People without engineering degrees making hysterical comments about engineering matters, common sense says take them with a grain of salt.Have you ever believed a single rumor? You're welcome to be a skeptic in a sport where 75% of stuff you hear turns out to be false but come on...you don't think there's conceivably an ounce of truth to this?
I certainly think it's plausible. Plenty of leaks from plenty of people within the industry...enough that NASCAR had to send out a memo to drivers about it. So either they're all "in" on starting something false or there's some truth to what they're saying.
Doesn't NASCAR regularly do crash testing of the current model?All I would say is it is AWFULLY late in the game to be doing ANY kind of crash testing and critically late if there is actually anything that would need to be changed.
the drivers do that Seriously Nascar has various instruments in the cars and trucks to measure/film impacts and then the cars comes back to the lab and they analyze it for the damages that were done. Recently when Logano's car had a lowered roof from a crash, a memo went out with changes to that area of the car. It's a never ending process. It is one of the reasons they limit the speeds. They have the damage data and can build for that. Faster speeds means more testing/designing/expenseDoesn't NASCAR regularly do crash testing of the current model?